2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Emission From Non-Spherical Dust Grains With Rough Surfaces: Application to Lunar Dust

Abstract: Electrons impinging on a target can release secondary electrons and/or they can be scattered out of the target. It is well established that the number of escaping electrons per primary electron depends on the target composition and dimensions, the energy, and incidence angle of the primary electrons, but there are suggestions that the target's shape and surface roughness also influence the secondary emission. We present a further modification of the model of secondary electron emission from dust grains which i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the potential measured above a silica dust covered surface showed ~14 V more negative than that above a smooth, solid silica surface in an identical plasma condition. The reduced SE emission yield for the dusty surface is therefore not due to different surface materials in the above experiments, rather should be mainly attributed to the re‐absorption of the emitted SEs by neighboring dust particles or structures [ Wang et al ., ; Martin and von Engel , ; Wiese et al ., ; Richterová et al ., ; Ma et al ., ]. This mechanism supports our patched charge model and should be also true for photoelectrons emitted from dusty surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the potential measured above a silica dust covered surface showed ~14 V more negative than that above a smooth, solid silica surface in an identical plasma condition. The reduced SE emission yield for the dusty surface is therefore not due to different surface materials in the above experiments, rather should be mainly attributed to the re‐absorption of the emitted SEs by neighboring dust particles or structures [ Wang et al ., ; Martin and von Engel , ; Wiese et al ., ; Richterová et al ., ; Ma et al ., ]. This mechanism supports our patched charge model and should be also true for photoelectrons emitted from dusty surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The model calculations in Richterová et al [] are based on an assumption of the spherical symmetry; thus, it does not allow us to check directly the hypothesis of a nonspherical shape of the grain. For this reason, we have changed the coordinate system used in the model and applied a new modification that includes a nonspherical shape of grains (see Richterova et al [] for a detailed description). Figure presents calculated potentials of cuboids from SiO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface potentials of cuboids from SiO 2 calculated according to Richterova et al []. See text for a detailed description.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. This is likely due to the surface roughness that can re-absorb the emitted electrons 20,29,30,31,32,33 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%