2020
DOI: 10.1080/21683603.2020.1763877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary school students and self-efficacy in mathematics: Gender and age differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study's findings that there is no interplay between track and self-directed learning do not as well cohere with the findings of Slater et al [43]. The study supports the findings of earlier studies that sex does not influence students' self-efficacy in learning [60][61][62][63]. The findings agree with studies investigating family income and selfefficacy in learning [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Extent Of Academic Motivationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The present study's findings that there is no interplay between track and self-directed learning do not as well cohere with the findings of Slater et al [43]. The study supports the findings of earlier studies that sex does not influence students' self-efficacy in learning [60][61][62][63]. The findings agree with studies investigating family income and selfefficacy in learning [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Extent Of Academic Motivationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One such limitation is that the effect of time was not incorporated into the model. Research in educational psychology has found that gender differences in occupational choices develop overtime (Mozahem et al 2018), and that the information received from the four sources of self-efficacy is mediated by the gender of children over time (Mozahem et al 2020). These results support social roles theories that argue that males and females undergo different socialization processes and that these processes develop over time.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Usher and Pajares (2006) found gender based difference of effect which these sources put on students. Mozahem et al (2020) did not found significant gender based differences for all sources. Chen ( 2012) and Loo and Choy (2013) revealed mastery experience as the most powerful determinant of efficacy in mathematics as contrary to Yurt (2014) finding personal experience, social feedback and emotionality being significant dynamics for affecting mathematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…When they find others as their class fellows and teachers to solve mathematics easily they imagine themselves to do in the same manner. Other fellows work as a mirror for them in which they see their own reflection performing the same task with same standards and accuracy (Mozahem et al, 2020).Contrary to it, Loo and Choy (2013) have the view that vicarious experiences have feeble effects on efficacy than mastery experiences. However, if a student faces unfamiliar situation of which he has no prior experience but finds others performing that task without any difficulty, he can generate expectations and this is the time when if he puts effort he can accomplish that task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%