2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.010132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary school students’ misunderstandings of potential wells and tunneling

Abstract: In order to investigate students' misunderstandings of potential wells and tunneling, a conceptual knowledge test was administered to Dutch secondary school students after they were taught about quantum mechanics. A frequency analysis of responses to the multiple choice questions (n ¼ 98) and coding of the responses to the open-ended questions and explanations (n ¼ 13) shows that Dutch secondary school students experience difficulties similar to those reported for undergraduate students. The students' underlyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A profusion of conceptual difficulties have been reported across a variety of settings, topics, and approaches (e.g., Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2017). At the introductory level, students' conceptual difficulties with wave functions and potentials have been documented, to include for instance, a) students describing wave functions as trajectories of particles (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020), b) students describing potentials as physical objects (McKagan et al, 2008b;Özcan et al, 2009), c) students stating that energy or effort is needed to tunnel through a potential barrier (McKagan et al, 2008b;Özcan et al, 2009;Wittmann et al, 2005), or d) students misinterpreting the amplitude of the wave function as a measure for the energy level (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020;McKagan et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Conceptual Difficulties: a Learning Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A profusion of conceptual difficulties have been reported across a variety of settings, topics, and approaches (e.g., Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2017). At the introductory level, students' conceptual difficulties with wave functions and potentials have been documented, to include for instance, a) students describing wave functions as trajectories of particles (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020), b) students describing potentials as physical objects (McKagan et al, 2008b;Özcan et al, 2009), c) students stating that energy or effort is needed to tunnel through a potential barrier (McKagan et al, 2008b;Özcan et al, 2009;Wittmann et al, 2005), or d) students misinterpreting the amplitude of the wave function as a measure for the energy level (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020;McKagan et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Conceptual Difficulties: a Learning Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual difficulties surface as students inappropriately activate cognitive or metacognitive resources. When students' meaning-making fails, their reasoning is based on combinations of, for example, a) everyday experiences, b) misinformation in society, c) pedagogic inadequacies, d) linguistic cues, e) inappropriate analogies related to classical physics, and f) their epistemological assumptions (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020;Taber, 2005). An example of an incorrect epistemological assumption is that students reason classically in terms of energy assuming that a particle needs energy to cross a potential barrier (e.g., Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Difficulties: a Learning Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondary school students have difficulties when developing their conceptual understanding which has been reported across a variety of settings and approaches. Topics in QP that students struggle to understand are for example light (Henriksen et al 2018), atomic spectra (Savall-Alemany et al 2019), potential wells, and tunnelling (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al 2020). Students have conceptual difficulties because they are required to a) map abstract mathematical models to experiences in the physical world, b) come to terms with counterintuitive phenomena and concepts, c) transition from a deterministic worldview to a probabilistic one, and d) understand the language to express QP phenomena and concepts (Bouchée et al, under review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements hinder students' meaning-making process leading them to hold on to classical or common sense notions while learning QP (e.g. Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al 2020). Insights into students' conceptual difficulties have led to the development of different teaching strategies, such as the use of digital materials or discussing the history and philosophy of QP (Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%