1969
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5655.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Septicaemia from Intravenous Cannulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have recorded an even greater frequency of unintended effects, Gray (1967) reporting that only one third of intravenous infusions were free of some undesired effects and that the latter were strongly related to the duration of treatment. Bacterial contamination of intravenous fluid administrations sets is common (Banks, Yates, Cawdrew, Harris & Kidner, 1970) but septicaemia from this source appears surprisingly rare although Darrell & Garrod (1969) have reported two patients who died following septicaemia arising in this way. No patients developed septicaemia in the present series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have recorded an even greater frequency of unintended effects, Gray (1967) reporting that only one third of intravenous infusions were free of some undesired effects and that the latter were strongly related to the duration of treatment. Bacterial contamination of intravenous fluid administrations sets is common (Banks, Yates, Cawdrew, Harris & Kidner, 1970) but septicaemia from this source appears surprisingly rare although Darrell & Garrod (1969) have reported two patients who died following septicaemia arising in this way. No patients developed septicaemia in the present series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mixed infections sometimes occur, as illustrated by case 5, in which more than one strain was probably isolated from the blood at different times during life, and also from the valve at necropsy. This may have indicated infection by multiple strains at operation, or superinfection during intravenous treatment (Darrell and Garrod, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying reports quote different incidences ofinfection, but certainly unless strict aseptic precautions are used at the time of setting up the central venous line, and good care taken of the catheter site during its time in situ, a high proportion of catheter tips will show signs of infection. All catheter tips should be cultured on removal (Wilmore and Dudrick, 1969;Bolasny et al, 1970;Colvin et al, 1972;Darrell and Garrod, 1969). Henzel and DeWeese (1971) pointed out that the design of some indwelling catheters is such that a portion of the catheter may be accidentally detached as a catheter embolus with dangerous consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%