2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary structures in RNA synthesis, splicing and translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 272 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Figure 8 shows, although tRNA was previously thought to be a key contributor to translational speed, RandomRibo supports more recent studies showing that it is not as important in determining final ribosome velocity [18]. On the overall transcriptome level, both RNA Secondary Structure (RSS) and resistive electrostatic force are negatively correlated to final ribosome speed for the ramp codons 50 to 300 (R = −0.175, p = 5.52e-03; R = −0.276, p = 9.26e-06), corroborating previous data and explanations stating that secondary structures form barriers to ribosomes and positive charges slow down movement [21,22,16]. Therefore, RandomRibo can identify not only significant but scientifically consistent translation velocity determinants.…”
Section: Translation Elongation Velocity Determinants Found By Random...supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Figure 8 shows, although tRNA was previously thought to be a key contributor to translational speed, RandomRibo supports more recent studies showing that it is not as important in determining final ribosome velocity [18]. On the overall transcriptome level, both RNA Secondary Structure (RSS) and resistive electrostatic force are negatively correlated to final ribosome speed for the ramp codons 50 to 300 (R = −0.175, p = 5.52e-03; R = −0.276, p = 9.26e-06), corroborating previous data and explanations stating that secondary structures form barriers to ribosomes and positive charges slow down movement [21,22,16]. Therefore, RandomRibo can identify not only significant but scientifically consistent translation velocity determinants.…”
Section: Translation Elongation Velocity Determinants Found By Random...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Ribosome profiling data, or Ribo-seq, is an essential tool for translation velocity determinant analysis [18]; when combined with high-throughput sequencing, this experimental protocol provides a snapshot of all actively translating ribosomes in a cell with positional information at single nucleotide resolution [6]. Using Ribo-seq data, previous studies have identified codon-specific dwell time [19,20], mRNA secondary structures [21,22], and nascent chain interactions with the ribosome exit tunnel [16,23] as key determinants of translational speed. Earlier approaches include techniques such as the inhomogeneous l-TASEP [18] for velocity calculation and the least-squares linear regression model [18,24] for determinant identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these features can lead to the formation of the inverted repeat and secondary structure, i.e., hairpin loop and Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRES)(34). The formation of these secondary structures benefits of host-virus interaction, i.e., viral RNA synthesis, splicing (34, 35), and host genome integration (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No direct HMGB‐mediated in vivo splicing mechanism has been demonstrated to date. Thus, non‐HMGB dual DNA and RNA binding proteins that impact splicing and other known splicing mechanisms are used to infer potential HMGB splicing mechanisms such as by modifying nascent RNA structure or the ability to form splicing complexes (Auboeuf et al, 2005; Georgakopoulos‐Soares et al, 2022; Han et al, 2017; Pandit et al, 2008; Rambout & Maquat, 2020; Saha et al, 2020; Scharfen & Neugebauer, 2021; Tang et al, 2021). As HMGBs likely interact with nascent RNA and may change the structure of RNA, it is possible that HMGBs direct manipulation of nascent RNA structure and/or the steric blocking or recruitment of splicing factors could alter splicing outcomes (Figure 6a–c).…”
Section: Hmgbs Interactions With Rna Impact Hmgb Cell Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As HMGBs likely interact with nascent RNA and may change the structure of RNA, it is possible that HMGBs direct manipulation of nascent RNA structure and/or the steric blocking or recruitment of splicing factors could alter splicing outcomes (Figure 6a–c). Sox family proteins, HMGB1, HMGB3, and other HMGBs all bind stem‐loop RNAs which are common RNA elements known to act as protein binding hubs during RNA processing, including splicing decisions (Georgakopoulos‐Soares et al, 2022; Kralovicova et al, 2015; Saha et al, 2020; Tang et al, 2021). Further, Sox6 appears to be important for spliceosome assembly.…”
Section: Hmgbs Interactions With Rna Impact Hmgb Cell Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%