1998
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secretory Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Gene Expression Requires both a PU.1 and a Novel Composite NF-κB/PU.1/ GA-binding Protein Binding Site

Abstract: The human secretory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (secretory IL-1Ra) gene is controlled through three lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-responsive promoter elements, one of which was identified as an NF-B binding site. Sequence analysis of the secretory IL-1Ra promoter identified a potential PU.1 binding site located between positions ؊80 and ؊90 on the complementary strand overlapping the NF-B site. Gel shift analysis using this potential binding site with nuclear extracts from RAW 264.7 macrophages demonstrated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis for regulatory elements within the 5Ј flanking region revealed a number of potentially important transcription factors involved in controlling the expression of this gene. However, in contrast to the IL-1␤ promoter (trout and mammals) (40) and IL-1ra promoter (63,64), no NF-B sites were discovered, consistent with the rather slow induction seen, with NF-B being a rapidly activated transcription factor induced via pattern recognition receptor recognition of pathogen-derived molecules (8). IL-1ra exists as secreted (sIL-1ra) and intracellular (icIL-1ra) molecules, driven by two independent promoters, with alternative splicing of the exon containing the signal peptide generating the two forms (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis for regulatory elements within the 5Ј flanking region revealed a number of potentially important transcription factors involved in controlling the expression of this gene. However, in contrast to the IL-1␤ promoter (trout and mammals) (40) and IL-1ra promoter (63,64), no NF-B sites were discovered, consistent with the rather slow induction seen, with NF-B being a rapidly activated transcription factor induced via pattern recognition receptor recognition of pathogen-derived molecules (8). IL-1ra exists as secreted (sIL-1ra) and intracellular (icIL-1ra) molecules, driven by two independent promoters, with alternative splicing of the exon containing the signal peptide generating the two forms (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL-1ra exists as secreted (sIL-1ra) and intracellular (icIL-1ra) molecules, driven by two independent promoters, with alternative splicing of the exon containing the signal peptide generating the two forms (65). The sIL-1ra promoter also requires PU.1 and GABP for LPS responsiveness (63), whereas the icIL-1ra promoter requires NF-IL-6 in addition to NF-B (64), with AP-1 driving constitutive expression (66). Multiple NF-IL-6 and AP-1 sites were identifiable in the nIL-1F promoter region, although in contrast to the icIL-1ra promoter there was a TATA box, also present in the sIL-1ra promoter (65), suggesting conventional transcriptional initiation of the nIL-1F gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). Although the core sequence GAGGAA is known to be required for efficient PU.1 binding, bases outside of this core motif can also affect proper PU.1 binding (48,49). Mutation of the PU-1 binding site only partially reduced PU.1-induced activation of the CD10 promoter (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified p65 as the transcription factor binding to the NK-B site on the icIL-1Ra promoter in keratinocytes treated with IL-1␣. Smith et al (32) demonstrated that the NF-B site is the regulatory sequence responsible for the induction of sIL-1Ra by LPS. Supershift experiments showed that in keratinocytes the binding complex contains the p65/p65 homodimer.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty micrograms of RNA were separated on a formaldehyde-containing 1% agarose gel, transferred onto nylon membranes (Micron Separations, Westboro, MA), and UV cross-linked to the membrane using a Stratalinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). cDNA for the C/EBPs and GAPDH were radiolabeled with [␣- 32 P]dCTP using the Decaprime II random prime kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The blot was prehybridized (5ϫ SSC phosphate/EDTA (SSPE), 5ϫ Denhardt's solution, 150 g/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, 0.5% SDS, and 10% dextran sulfate) for 3 h and hybridized for 20 h at 68°C.…”
Section: Northern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%