Section 2. Réflexions sur le commerce transnational entre juges

From Geneva to San José: The ILO standards and the Inter‐American System for the protection of human rights

“…Furthermore, this approach contributes to making universal the interpretation of provisions issued by the ILO; it creates a greater regulatory convergence at global, regional and national levels (Blackett, 2019) and it encourages actors to use a common language to address this type of social issue (Thomas, 1948). This dynamic is part of a growing trend among international judges to participate in exchanges and dialogue (Hansbury, 2016;Lixinski, 2017;Burgorgue-Larsen, 2009;Hennebel and van Waeyenberge, 2012).…”

“…38 As regards the IACtHR more specifically, this cross-referencing approach, here essentially used to interpret and evaluate context, enriches its work and consolidates its role in the interpretation of the Pact of San José (Novitz, 2010). This approach, which is applied both by the IACtHR and by its European counterpart, contributes to the universalization of the interpretation of standards for the protection of human rights in the area of labour and to the growing tendency among international judges to participate in exchange and dialogue (Hansbury, 2016;Teklè, 2018;Lixinski, 2017;Burgorgue-Larsen, 2009;Hennebel and van Waeyenberge, 2012).…”

De Ginebra a San José: las normas de la OIT y el sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos

“…Además, este método de referencias cruzadas contribuye a la universalización de la interpretación de las normas de la OIT, promueve una mayor convergencia normativa a nivel mundial, regional y nacional (Blackett, 2019) y alienta a los actores a utilizar un lenguaje común para tratar este tipo de cuestiones sociales (Thomas, 1947). Esta dinámica está en consonancia con la creciente tendencia de los jueces internacionales al intercambio y al diálogo (Hansbury, 2016;Lixinski, 2017;Burgorgue-Larsen, 2009;Hennebel y Van Waeyenberge, 2012).…”