1995
DOI: 10.1002/oa.1390050303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secular decline in cranioskeletal size over two millennia of interior central California prehistory: Relation to calcium deficit in the reconstructed diet and demographic stress

Abstract: An osteometric study of residual rickets (RR) skeletal plasticity has been made of a timeordered sequence of fifteen series of adult skeleton sets (n=359) from the Great Valley of central California (GV), spanning the three archaeological horizons of California Indian prehistory in this region: Early (EH), Middle (MH) and Late (LH). By least-squares linear regression analysis, a clear and continuous downward trend obtained in cranioskeletal size in both sexes, proceeding from EH to LH in the GV sequence, parip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large cranioskeletal size of SFBR Series 5-9 relative to SBC Series 1-4 is readily apparent in Table 1. Also notable is the fact that our oceanside Coast Miwok skeletons, Series 8-9, controlling for archaeological time, are on average slightly smaller than their presumed Miwok congeners in the Great Valley [2], but of about the same size as their bayside Miwok and Costanoan neighbours to the southeast [1]. The latter, not entirely unexpected, finding is of course accepted as further osteometric validation of the San Francisco Bay Indian physical type [1,30,33,53].…”
Section: Series 6 [1]mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The large cranioskeletal size of SFBR Series 5-9 relative to SBC Series 1-4 is readily apparent in Table 1. Also notable is the fact that our oceanside Coast Miwok skeletons, Series 8-9, controlling for archaeological time, are on average slightly smaller than their presumed Miwok congeners in the Great Valley [2], but of about the same size as their bayside Miwok and Costanoan neighbours to the southeast [1]. The latter, not entirely unexpected, finding is of course accepted as further osteometric validation of the San Francisco Bay Indian physical type [1,30,33,53].…”
Section: Series 6 [1]mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…J. Osteoarchaeol. 8: 135-179 (1998) Channel; 34°N 23 28 48 23,23 23 22 23 23 23 n 23 23 23 n b -----2 The osteoarchaeological sample (Table 1) The skeletal material, usually well curated and restored, was drawn from museum collections of fairly well dated or phased archaeological specimens, a conscious effort being made to select for the anatomically more complete and better preserved adult same-individual sets of cranium, femurs and tibias, as explained in earlier reports [1][2][3][4]. The 14 osteometric series are grouped by cultural and natural area and latitude, rather than by time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Significant correlations have been found between tissue isotopic enrichment of nitrogen and daily food ration size (Hobson et al, 1993;Focken, 2001;Gaye-Siessegger et al, 2003, water availability (Ambrose and DeNiro, 1987), diet quality (Hobson and Clark, 1992;Robbins et al, 2005), fasting (Hobson et al, 1993), and growth rate (Martinez del Rio and Wolf, 2005;Trueman et al, 2005). However, with few exceptions (e.g., White and Armelagos, 1997;Katzenberg and Lovell, 1999;Hedges and Reynard, 2007), consideration of nutritional or physiological stress in isotopic diet modeling has been limited to ecological studies, in spite of a considerable body of osteological literature on nutritional stress in archaeological populations (e.g., Angel, 1975Angel, , 1981Angel, , 1984Saul, 1977;Prendergast-Moore et al, 1986;White, 1988White, , 1999Danforth, 1994;Ubelaker, 1994;Ivanhoe, 1995;Larsen, 1997;Sobolik, 2002;Ortner, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%