2021
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.opodis.2020.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security Analysis of Ripple Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate a double-spend attack on the XRPL client, we have first deployed a network of ten validators configured as a full mesh network, which means every validator was connected to every other. All validators were set to participate in the consensus process and were included in the so-called unique node list (UNL) [27]. This configuration was chosen to maximize the number of nodes participating in the consensus process, making the network more robust and representative.…”
Section: ) Simulating and Analyzing Double Spend Attacks On Xrpl Usin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate a double-spend attack on the XRPL client, we have first deployed a network of ten validators configured as a full mesh network, which means every validator was connected to every other. All validators were set to participate in the consensus process and were included in the so-called unique node list (UNL) [27]. This configuration was chosen to maximize the number of nodes participating in the consensus process, making the network more robust and representative.…”
Section: ) Simulating and Analyzing Double Spend Attacks On Xrpl Usin...mentioning
confidence: 99%