2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security constrained DC OPF considering generator responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control input 𝑃 and 𝐸 is corresponding input to governor set value and AVR reference value. The whole problem to find the solution by (18) has inequality of 𝑃 ≤ 1 and equality of 𝐸 = 1. Therefore, that control input is suitable not only during the transient period but also after the steady-state is achieved.…”
Section: Discussion On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The control input 𝑃 and 𝐸 is corresponding input to governor set value and AVR reference value. The whole problem to find the solution by (18) has inequality of 𝑃 ≤ 1 and equality of 𝐸 = 1. Therefore, that control input is suitable not only during the transient period but also after the steady-state is achieved.…”
Section: Discussion On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So if the time gap between rescheduling and contingency is varied there is no effect on the stability of the system. According to (18) the corresponding solution always guaranteed a stable performance. In this paper, the corresponding field excitation is always kept 1 after rescheduling, also there is no change in field excitation control and AVR performance, this is observed in Figures 24 to 27.…”
Section: Discussion On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations