2006
DOI: 10.1080/13533310500424744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security governance by internationals: The case of Kosovo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Meanwhile, a major flaw in the approach of the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) was mostly limiting SSR to the exercise of capacity-building without close cooperation with civil society and the media. 20 Such problems can be attributed to what has been characterized as a 'slide towards expediency', in which programmes aimed at increasing the democratic accountability of the security sector 'have been superseded by a singular focus on training and equipping the country's fledgling security forces', 21 as exemplified by the case of Afghanistan. This 'slide towards expediency' also reinforces the suspicions of those resistant to SSR on the principle that it compromises developmental objectives.…”
Section: Establishing a Common Vision For Ssrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19 Meanwhile, a major flaw in the approach of the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) was mostly limiting SSR to the exercise of capacity-building without close cooperation with civil society and the media. 20 Such problems can be attributed to what has been characterized as a 'slide towards expediency', in which programmes aimed at increasing the democratic accountability of the security sector 'have been superseded by a singular focus on training and equipping the country's fledgling security forces', 21 as exemplified by the case of Afghanistan. This 'slide towards expediency' also reinforces the suspicions of those resistant to SSR on the principle that it compromises developmental objectives.…”
Section: Establishing a Common Vision For Ssrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While historically examining the restraining of conflict, this area of the literature has burgeoned as of late and is incorporating more elements examining policing (Holm & Eide, 2000). Specifically, there have developed three significant areas within the peacekeeping literature: (a) the evaluation of police reform and rebuilding, similar to post-conflict policing (Gbla, 2006;Hood, 2006;Heinemann-Gruder & Grebenschikov, 2006;International Crisis Group, 2002, 2005Murray, 2007;Suhrke & Samset, 2007), (b) the development of metrics by which to judge police reform (Brzoska, 2006;Hannum, 2006;Hazen, 2007;Serafino, 2004), and (c) case studies of police intervention in conflict (Oakley et al, 1998).…”
Section: Peacekeeping and Peacebuildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While peacekeeping is the area of research within policing that most closely deals with conflict, again we see surprisingly little information regarding police behavior during conflict. The vast majority of the literature focuses on the reform of police forces after intervention or, even more frequently, evaluations of the success or failure of specific international policing missions, most frequently the United Nations Civilian Police (UN CIVPOL now UNPOL; Heinemann- Gruder & Grebenschikov, 2006;Hood, 2006;Murray, 2007). Additionally, there is limited information on what the policing implementation process is for specific conflict, but again, it focuses on the organizational level instead of actively reviewing police activity.…”
Section: Peacekeeping and Peacebuildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These justifications for the importance of RoL programming in the transformation agenda are strengthened by the fact that in some cases individuals working within RoL institutions are themselves active in modes of criminality that contribute to political economies of violence (Brand, 2002;Dziedzic et al, 2002;Heinemann-Grüder and Grebenschikov, 2006). Security agents, both local and international, are known to be either the direct beneficiaries of conflict-related trade, or complicit-facilitators who benefit from the corruption on which other war economy participants rely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%