2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2927366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment Classification of Small-Size Seabed Acoustic Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Seabed acoustic images are image data mosaics derived from seafloor acoustic backscattering intensity data, which is related to the type of sediment covering the seabed. Therefore, submarine sediment classification can be realized using seabed acoustic images, and has been studied extensively. Recently, deep learning has also rapidly advanced; in particular, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are now being used to achieve remarkable results in the field of image processing-showing that they are well-sui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and second rows are airplanes and drowning victims, respectively; and the third and fourth rows are wedge and cylinder mines, respectively. be compared with the method using BOF descriptor [56] on SIFT features [57] and SVM classification, the method using a shallow CNN trained from scratch [40], the gcForest method using Deep Forest [58], the method using deep learning of small datasets [59]. All the methods used for comparison have been demonstrated to be effective on small-scale training data: Before the rise of deep learning, the SIFT-based descriptors usually perform best among various local descriptors [60], and SVM can work well with only small samples [61]; the gcForest method is highly competitive to deep neural networks and can work well even when there are only small-scale training data; the method in [59] transfers all the layers of a pretrained VGG16 network except the last two full connect layers, add a new fully connected layer, and then fine-tunes it to achieve good performance on small datasets.…”
Section: A Experiments Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first and second rows are airplanes and drowning victims, respectively; and the third and fourth rows are wedge and cylinder mines, respectively. be compared with the method using BOF descriptor [56] on SIFT features [57] and SVM classification, the method using a shallow CNN trained from scratch [40], the gcForest method using Deep Forest [58], the method using deep learning of small datasets [59]. All the methods used for comparison have been demonstrated to be effective on small-scale training data: Before the rise of deep learning, the SIFT-based descriptors usually perform best among various local descriptors [60], and SVM can work well with only small samples [61]; the gcForest method is highly competitive to deep neural networks and can work well even when there are only small-scale training data; the method in [59] transfers all the layers of a pretrained VGG16 network except the last two full connect layers, add a new fully connected layer, and then fine-tunes it to achieve good performance on small datasets.…”
Section: A Experiments Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, by interleaving multiple convolutional and pooling layers, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown great advantages in object classification [24]- [26], object detection [27], [28], and semantic segmentation [29], [30], sometimes even able to surpass human ability. Recently, CNNs have also been applied to MLOs or marine vessels detection [31]- [37] and seafloor classification [38]- [40], and have been proven to be more effective than traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last fully connected layers of this model were transferred to a new CNN, which was fine-tuned with a semisynthetic sonar dataset. The results reported in [ 128 ] were compared with more traditional methods for object classification, such as Support Vector Machines, a shallow CNN [ 134 ] and Deep Forests [ 135 ], where the TL-CNN showed better performance and accuracy. However, no comparison was described with respect to state-of-the-art methods for object classification from sonar, such as GNNs [ 62 ] (described at Section 3.2 ).…”
Section: Machine Learning For the Classification Of Underwater Acoust...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different types of seabed sediments provide important reference information for scientific research via seabed geological surveys, marine engineering construction, marine space planning, and benthic communities [1][2][3][4]. Traditional snapshot sampling and underwater photography are inefficient and costly for sediment classification [5]. On the contrary, it is feasible to utilize an intensity image of acoustic backscattering to judge the type of underwater sediments present, based on a certain number of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%