2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0380-1330(04)70383-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment Trap Studies in Lake Superior: Insights into Resuspension, Cross-margin Transport, and Carbon Cycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple mixing ratio calculation would suggest that 65% of the material in nearshore traps (35 m below water surface) is derived from resuspension and that 44% in offshore traps (again at 35 m below water surface) is derived from resuspension. Similar observations were made for organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the sediment trap material collected in this study [ Urban et al , 2004b].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A simple mixing ratio calculation would suggest that 65% of the material in nearshore traps (35 m below water surface) is derived from resuspension and that 44% in offshore traps (again at 35 m below water surface) is derived from resuspension. Similar observations were made for organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the sediment trap material collected in this study [ Urban et al , 2004b].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The discrepancy between sediment accumulation rates and sedimentation rates in sediment traps is due to sediment resuspension and subsequent focusing. Sedimentation rates at 35‐m depth measured in this study (0.4 ± 0.07 g m −2 d −1 [ Urban et al , 2004b]) are slightly higher than those reported in the central lake area (∼0.14 g m −2 d −1 [ Baker et al , 1991]) because of higher resuspension rates in nearshore areas; the discrepancy is larger in traps placed 5 m above the sediments (1.1 ± 0.3 versus 0.14 ∼ 1.1 g m −2 d −1 ). Hence it is more appropriate to estimate a residence time for 210 Pb in the nearshore water column (mean depth 50 m) of ≤34 days based on the sediment trap fluxes; this residence time suggests the settling velocity is roughly 1.5 m d −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urban et al (2004) also reported higher d 15 N during winter compared to summer in organic matter collected in sediment trap of Lake Superior and concluded seasonal shift in nutrient source for phytoplankton to be the most likely reason. Taken together, patterns in natural abundance d 15 N POM in Lake Superior are consistent with earlier studies in the Great Lakes (McCusker et al 1999;Urban et al 2004;Kumar et al 2008) and provides an insight into the seasonal nutrient utilization with predominantly NH 4 ? utilization during winter and relatively higher NO 3 -use during summer.…”
Section: Pom Formation and Role Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Auer et al (2013) focused on depth distribution in characterizing a "ring of fire" where amphipod populations reach peaks in density at depths along nearshore-offshore transects in Lake Superior. Here, organic carbon fluxes (Urban et al, 2004) were found to be 2-4 times greater at slope sites (depth, 30-125 m) hosting peak densities than at profundal locations (depth N 125 m) supporting much lower amphipod abundance. The consumption-food availability relationship developed in this paper, applied within the context of a bioenergetics model, may find application in further exploring the "ring of fire" phenomenon.…”
Section: Implications For Patterns In Food Supply and Diporeia Abundancementioning
confidence: 69%