1995
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.295.10.1220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentary basin taper as a factor controlling the geometry and advance of thrust belts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
90
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These are in general also the areas where the foreland monocline is steeper [2]. The Apennines foredeep was punctuated by the growth of folds which terminated along transfer zones.…”
Section: Foreland Dip Versus Thrust Belt Structure Foredeep and Seismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are in general also the areas where the foreland monocline is steeper [2]. The Apennines foredeep was punctuated by the growth of folds which terminated along transfer zones.…”
Section: Foreland Dip Versus Thrust Belt Structure Foredeep and Seismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1) is a common feature for all thrust belts and accretionary wedges [1,2]. The foreland geology is often understated in regional studies of orogens, in spite of its crucial role in controlling the thrust belts evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To keep the experiments as simple as possible, the influence of interlayered detachment layers, which plays an important role in numerous fold-andthrust belts [e.g., Davis and Engelder, 1985] including the southern Pyrenees [Séguret, 1972;Muñoz, 1992;Soto et al, 2004], was not simulated. Moreover, the influence of surface processes (syntectonic erosion and sedimentation) was not included in the experiments, as well as the forelandward tapering that commonly occurs in natural rock multilayers deposited in foreland basins [e.g., Boyer, 1995]. These limitations, which characterize most sandbox experiments [e.g., Malavieille, 1984;Liu et al, 1992;Mulugeta and Koyi, 1992;Wang and Davis, 1996;Storti et al, 2001;Smit et al, 2003], do not significantly impact model results when the role of specific parameters is investigated by comparing experimental results without attempting to simulate in detail the internal architecture of natural orogens [Storti et al, 2000].…”
Section: Experimental Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foreland geology is often understated in regional studies of orogens, in spite of its crucial role in controlling the thrust beits evolution . The foreland monocline tends to increase its dip toward the interior of the beits (Boyer, 1995), and its subsidence rate controls the development of the trench or the foreland basin, whatever is their origin .…”
Section: Abstracttmentioning
confidence: 99%