2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1513238112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed exchange networks, ethnicity, and sorghum diversity

Abstract: Recent studies investigating the relationship between crop genetic diversity and human cultural diversity patterns showed that seed exchanges are embedded in farmers' social organization. However, our understanding of the social processes involved remains limited. We investigated how farmers' membership in three major social groups interacts in shaping sorghum seed exchange networks in a cultural contact zone on Mount Kenya. Farmers are members of residence groups at the local scale and of dialect groups clust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
63
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
63
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, our results contrast sharply with a recent comparative study between pearl millet and sorghum population genetic structure on Mount Kenya slopes (Labeyrie et al , 2016). These authors failed to show any genetic structure for pearl millet, contrarily to sorghum, when sampling from six different ethno-linguistic neighbouring groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, our results contrast sharply with a recent comparative study between pearl millet and sorghum population genetic structure on Mount Kenya slopes (Labeyrie et al , 2016). These authors failed to show any genetic structure for pearl millet, contrarily to sorghum, when sampling from six different ethno-linguistic neighbouring groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have acknowledged the role of traditional knowledge and culture practices of smallholder farmers and indigenous communities for biodiversity conservation at the species, genetic, ecosystem, and landscape levels (Altieri, 2004). Many traditional management practices, customs, and beliefs have been reported to contribute to biodiversity protection including seed exchange systems (Labeyrie, Thomas, Muthamia, & Leclerc, 2016), marriage exchanges (DelĂȘtre, McKey, & Hodkinson, 2011), religious rituals (Mazumdar & Mazumdar, 2012), and dietary traditions (Penafiel, Lachat, Espinel, Van Damme, & Kolsteren, 2011). These practices, customs, and beliefs have been linked to preserving crop landraces (Jackson, Pascual, & Hodgkin, 2007), old trees (Salick et al., 2007), and economic plants (Liu et al., 2014) including those with esthetic, food, and medicinal values (Begum et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La synthĂšse d'Ă©tudes menĂ©es sur diffĂ©rentes espĂšces et dans divers pays montre l'efficacitĂ© des systĂšmes semenciers locaux, favorisant la diffusion rapide de nouvelles variĂ©tĂ©s, parfois sur de longues distances (Coomes et al, 2015). Ces Ă©tudes montrent notamment que les agriculteurs ont frĂ©quem-ment recours aux marchĂ©s pour se procurer du matĂ©riel vĂ©gĂ©tal (McGuire et Sperling, 2016), et mobilisent leur rĂ©seau de relations sociales, notamment leur parentĂšle (Labeyrie et al, 2015). Cependant, Kombo et al (2012) rapportent que la majoritĂ© du matĂ©riel vĂ©gĂ©tal utilisĂ© par les exploitations d'une zone proche d'Oyo est autoproduit, et que seul 6 % est obtenu auprĂšs des proches, et 0,6 % sur les marchĂ©s.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified