yr Ϫ1 ; Wolf and Fiske, 1995; Brejda, 2000). The compromise between yield and quality does not apply to bio-Management practices for biomass production of bioenergy grasses mass production for bioenergy feedstock because the may differ from management for forage. Our objective was to determine the yield and stand responses of 'Alamo' switchgrass (Panicum goal generally is to maximize production of lignocelluvirgatum L.) to N and P fertilization as affected by row spacing. A lose (Sanderson et al., 1999a). Thus, management praccombination of five rates each of N and P were applied to plots during tices that maximize biomass production may differ from 1992 to 1998 at Stephenville, TX and 1993 to 1995 at Beeville, TX.that for herbage production. Annual yield of several Three row-spacing treatments were applied as subplots. Biomass proswitchgrass cultivars in Texas fertilized with 134 kg N duction was determined each year with a single harvest in late summer. ha Ϫ1 ranged from 8 to 20 Mg ha Ϫ1 , depending mainly Tiller density and tiller mass were measured during 1993 to 1996 at on seasonal rainfall variations (Sanderson et al., 1999b).
Stephenville. Biomass production was not influenced by the additionAlamo switchgrass was the most adapted cultivar for of P. Biomass production response to N at Beeville was greater in the south-central USA. narrow rows than wide rows during the establishment year only. Bio-Phosphorus fertilizer recommendations for switchmass production responses to N were quadratic in 5 of 7 yr at Stephenville and linear at Beeville. A maximum yield of 22.5 Mg ha Ϫ1 occurred grass depend on soil pH, P supplying power of the soil, during 1995 at Stephenville at 168 kg N ha Ϫ1 . Lodging occurred atand soil test P (Brejda, 2000). In the central Great Plains, both locations but only at the 224 kg N ha Ϫ1 rate. Tiller density and P recommendations for switchgrass ranged from 0 to mass increased as row width increased. Tiller mass also increased 35 kg ha Ϫ1 , depending on soil test P (Brejda, 2000). In Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems.