2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing is not necessarily the truth: Do institutional investors' corporate site visits reduce hosting firms' stock price crash risk?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we show that the increase effect and the reduction effect are dominant at different visit frequencies. This nonlinear relationship explains their conclusions from a more comprehensive perspective and provides detailed evidence for management opportunistic behaviour mentioned by Gao et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, we show that the increase effect and the reduction effect are dominant at different visit frequencies. This nonlinear relationship explains their conclusions from a more comprehensive perspective and provides detailed evidence for management opportunistic behaviour mentioned by Gao et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, institutional investors' visits will act on stock price crash risk through their impact on information quality and corporate governance. Gao et al (2017) argue that institutional investors' visits will reduce stock price crash risk, while Lu et al (2018) find a positive relationship between visit frequency and stock price crash risk. The inconsistency of the above conclusions confirms that the impact of institutional investors' visits has two sides due to management opportunism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations