Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2006.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing the Difference in IP Traffic: Wireless Versus Wireline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kilpi and Lassila [14] analyze the round-trip times of TCP flow data collected at a GPRS/UMTS network. Ridoux et al [22] collect data from a CDMA2000 network, and compare the similarities and differences with wireline data traffic. The DARWIN+ group [3] collects IP packets at a GPRS/UMTS network, and analyzes various issues such as TCP performance [21] and traffic anomalies [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kilpi and Lassila [14] analyze the round-trip times of TCP flow data collected at a GPRS/UMTS network. Ridoux et al [22] collect data from a CDMA2000 network, and compare the similarities and differences with wireline data traffic. The DARWIN+ group [3] collects IP packets at a GPRS/UMTS network, and analyzes various issues such as TCP performance [21] and traffic anomalies [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool has been used by many researchers [25], [26], [27], [28] for evaluating their traffic models with respect to the correct reproduction of the scaling structure of the modeled traffic. By comparing the busrtiness of the synthesized and original traffic at a variety of scales, researchers can evaluate how closely their model matches the correlation structure of the modeled network.…”
Section: B Energy and Scaling Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used by many researchers [20], [21], [22], [23] for evaluating their traffic models with respect to the correct reproduction of the scaling structure of the modeled traffic. By comparing the busrtiness of the synthesized and original traffic at a variety of scales, researchers can evaluate how closely their model matches the correlation structure of the modeled network.…”
Section: Energy and Scaling Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%