2021
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking a Widely Adoptable Practical Standard to Estimate Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Multiple‐Coil Reconstructions

Abstract: Background Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) is used to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems. Accurate and consistent estimations are needed to routinely use SNR to assess coils and image reconstruction techniques. Purpose To identify a reliable and practical method for SNR estimation in multiple‐coil reconstructions. Study Type Technical evaluation and comparison. Subjects/Phantom A uniform phantom and four healthy volunteers: 35, 38, 39 y/o males, 25 y/o female. Field Strength/Sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in order to evaluate the performance of the MR system, the SNR was evaluated on the images acquired by using MR scanner and the obtained results were compared with those found during previous QCs measurements. It was possible to observe a slight decrease in the SNR, such as not to invalidate the diagnosis, and not attributable to a malfunction of the coil; in fact, it can suffer from systematic errors due to scanner instabilities [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in order to evaluate the performance of the MR system, the SNR was evaluated on the images acquired by using MR scanner and the obtained results were compared with those found during previous QCs measurements. It was possible to observe a slight decrease in the SNR, such as not to invalidate the diagnosis, and not attributable to a malfunction of the coil; in fact, it can suffer from systematic errors due to scanner instabilities [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the BraCoil's parallel imaging performance, we additionally calculated 2D SNR and g -factor maps with simulated acceleration factors of R = 2, 4, 6, and 8 in left-right (LR) and head-foot (HF) direction using open source Matlab code 55 , 56 also based on the pseudo multiple replica method. Resulting g -factor maps were plotted in a coronal slice for 3 differently sized breasts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging parameters for SNR measurements were: repetition time (TR) = 200 ms, echo time (TE) = 5.8 ms, flip angle = 20°, voxel size = 1.6 × 1.6 × 10 mm 3 , pixel bandwidth (BW) = 130 Hz/pixel, and acquisition time (TA) = 38 s. The phantom SNR maps were reconstructed with 2.3 × 2.3 × 10 mm 3 voxels. Geometry factor maps 18 were calculated from the same data using methods described by Montin and Lattanzi 57 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%