2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2525-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking–taking chain schedules of cocaine and sucrose self-administration: effects of reward size, reward omission, and α-flupenthixol

Abstract: RationaleIn heterogeneous seeking–taking (ST) chain schedules of self-administration, seeking rewards and taking rewards are distinct actions, giving animals explicit control over their intake of the reward. However, the neurobehavioral characteristics of ST chain schedules are relatively unexplored.ObjectivesThis study was made to evaluate two variants of ST chain schedules of self-administration to measure seeking and taking of sucrose and cocaine in rats.MethodsRats had to respond on one lever (seeking leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signal is considered important for the acquisition of complex reward-seeking behaviors (21, 22). Interestingly, dopamine receptor blockade has recently been shown to reduce response likelihood during a self-initiated reward-seeking action sequence (23) and accumbal dopamine depletions disrupt action performance when many actions are required to obtain reward (24), which is consistent with a large literature implicating dopamine in incentive motivation (25, 26), the process that allows reward-predictive cues to invigorate reward-seeking actions. Such findings raise the possibility that task-related dopamine signaling also exerts a motivational influence over reward-seeking actions.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This signal is considered important for the acquisition of complex reward-seeking behaviors (21, 22). Interestingly, dopamine receptor blockade has recently been shown to reduce response likelihood during a self-initiated reward-seeking action sequence (23) and accumbal dopamine depletions disrupt action performance when many actions are required to obtain reward (24), which is consistent with a large literature implicating dopamine in incentive motivation (25, 26), the process that allows reward-predictive cues to invigorate reward-seeking actions. Such findings raise the possibility that task-related dopamine signaling also exerts a motivational influence over reward-seeking actions.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The present data are reminiscent of those observed after administration of dopamine receptor antagonists during psychostimulant self-administration. In those experiments, reducing the reinforcing properties of cocaine with a dopamine receptor antagonist led to a decrease in breakpoint under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, which coincided with increased responding under a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement, as if to compensate for the reduced subjective effects of the drug [44][46]. Future experiments should elucidate whether altered appetitive, hedonic or reinforcing properties of sucrose underlies the effects of lShell DBS on operant responding for sucrose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some investigators maintain that the DLS is just as important as the NAc in the reinforcing effects of cocaine in early stages of cocaine addiction (Veeneman et al, 2012), while others have postulated that the progression from voluntary to compulsive drug use involves a transition from prefrontal cortical and NAc control to mediation by the dorsal striatum (Dalley et al, 2011, Everitt and Robbins, 2005). The results presented here demonstrate that estradiol can rapidly enhance cocaine’s neurobiological effects in DLS in females but not males, as has been previously reported for amphetamine (Castner et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%