2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.06547
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seemingly stable chemical kinetics can be stable, marginally stable, or unstable

Abstract: We present three examples of chemical reaction networks whose ordinary differential equation scaling limit are almost identical and in all cases stable. Nevertheless, the Markov jump processes associated to these reaction networks display the full range of behaviors: one is stable (positive recurrent), one is unstable (transient) and one is marginally stable (null recurrent). We study these differences and characterize the invariant measures by Lyapunov function techniques. In particular, we design a natural s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the agreement between the stochastic and the deterministic model for large volumes only holds on a finite time horizon only. Negative examples where the two modelling paradigms differ asymptotically are discussed in [19,20]. Our result shows that for large V , under the assumptions of Theorem 1, the stochastic and the deterministic models of (2) are in agreement asymptotically.…”
Section: B Volume Scalingmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the agreement between the stochastic and the deterministic model for large volumes only holds on a finite time horizon only. Negative examples where the two modelling paradigms differ asymptotically are discussed in [19,20]. Our result shows that for large V , under the assumptions of Theorem 1, the stochastic and the deterministic models of (2) are in agreement asymptotically.…”
Section: B Volume Scalingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…π(a + e i |n + 1) = n + 1 n + d π(a|n) π(a − e i |n − 1) = n + d − 1 n π(a|n)Plugging the ansatz(20) and these recurrence relations into (32), we get that equation (32) holds if and only ifδn+ d i=1 κa i a (i+1) d = δ(n+d−1)+ d i=1 κ(a i −1)(a (i+1) d +1).It simplifies to 0 = δ(d − 1) − κd. Such a condition is identically satisfied under the hypothesis of the theorem which guaranteesκ = d − 1 d δ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it would be interesting to study stationary distributions of autocatalytic CRNs with switching behavior [72], to identify a class of CRNs maintaining product-form Poisson distributions for all times [73] and to find when CRNs show nonexplosive behavior [74]. Another interesting direction will be to study stability of CRNs [75] and to estimate transition times between different attractors in CRNs [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it would be interesting to study stationary distributions of autocatalytic CRNs with switching behavior [69], to identify a class of CRNs maintaining product-form Poisson distributions for all times [70], and to find when CRNs show nonexplosive behavior [71]. Another interesting direction will be to study stability of CRNs [72] and to estimate transition times between different attractors in CRNs [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%