2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation in continental forearcs: Links between large-scale overriding plate structure and seismogenic behavior associated with the 2010 M 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average depth of the peaks at the six stations showing the Moho signal is about 34 km (Figure 2b, green). Bishop et al (2019) had two other profiles located much farther south, and the one shown in Figure 2b is the nearest to our main profile (Figure 1). In transferring their results to Figure 2b (red), we do not follow the original publication to extrapolate the Moho beyond the westernmost station showing the Moho signal (at ~38 km depth), located at roughly 140 km distance in Figure 3a of Bishop et al (2019).…”
Section: Moho Depthmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average depth of the peaks at the six stations showing the Moho signal is about 34 km (Figure 2b, green). Bishop et al (2019) had two other profiles located much farther south, and the one shown in Figure 2b is the nearest to our main profile (Figure 1). In transferring their results to Figure 2b (red), we do not follow the original publication to extrapolate the Moho beyond the westernmost station showing the Moho signal (at ~38 km depth), located at roughly 140 km distance in Figure 3a of Bishop et al (2019).…”
Section: Moho Depthmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Bishop et al (2019) had two other profiles located much farther south, and the one shown in Figure 2b is the nearest to our main profile (Figure 1). In transferring their results to Figure 2b (red), we do not follow the original publication to extrapolate the Moho beyond the westernmost station showing the Moho signal (at ~38 km depth), located at roughly 140 km distance in Figure 3a of Bishop et al (2019). In accordance with the two RF studies and taking into consideration their uncertainties, we assume the Moho to be in a depth range of 32-40 km (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Moho Depthmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This layering may be the deep expression of the Western Series, a now-exhumed paleo-accretionary complex that was basally accreted in the late Paleozoic (Glodny et al, 2005;Willner, 2005). This interpretation is supported by tomographic images and receiver function analysis suggesting the existence of underplated metasediments between ~20 and 40 km depth at the base of the forearc crust (Haberland et al, 2009;Bishop et al, 2019). Alternatively, the northern Chilean erosive margin does not exhibit clear geophysical imaging of underplated material (e.g., Oncken et al, 2003) despite indirect evidence (see the Surface Expression of Ongoing Basal Accretion section).…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The map shows ocean-continent subduction zones around the Circum-Pacific region with emphasis on segments where tectonic underplating is suspected, based on geophysical observations. (1) Hikurangi margin [64][65][66] , (2) Nankai margin 67 , (3) Sagami trough 23 , (4) Alaska margin 68,69 , (5) Cascadia margin [70][71][72] , (6) Costa Rica margin 73 , (7) North Chilean margin 74,75 and (8) Central Chilean margin 74,[76][77][78][79] . Black frames locate regions where trench-perpendicular topographic profiles have been compiled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%