2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9558-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak friction angle of 43°was obtained from the triaxial test, and the inter-friction angle between the rubble mound and the wall was about two-third of the peak friction angle in a direct shear test (Jo et al, 2014). The soil in the backfill was prepared using pluviation at a relative density of 80%.…”
Section: Model Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak friction angle of 43°was obtained from the triaxial test, and the inter-friction angle between the rubble mound and the wall was about two-third of the peak friction angle in a direct shear test (Jo et al, 2014). The soil in the backfill was prepared using pluviation at a relative density of 80%.…”
Section: Model Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the pseudo-static method based on M-O were assessed by comparing the differences between pseudo-static and true dynamic behaviours in centrifuge tests by many researchers (Nakamura, 2006;Al Atik & Sitar, 2010;Brandenberg et al, 2015;Hushmand et al, 2016;Wagner & Sitar, 2016;Jo et al, 2014Jo et al, , 2017. In this regard, the definition of k h could be further improved in future studies.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Two Major Considerations In Defining K Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate scaling factors for the dynamic events are specified in [13,19], and actual earthquake conditions could be simulated in the centrifuge model. Two input earthquake signals were used for the shaking events, including the Hachinohe earthquake motion recorded at Tokachi Oki, Japan (16 May 1968, Magnitude 7.9), which has long-period components; and the Ofunato earthquake motion recorded at Miyagi-Ken Oki, Japan (12 June 1978, Magnitude 7.4), which has short-period components (Figure 3 [24,25]). Two input earthquake signals were used for the shaking events, including the Hachinohe earthquake motion recorded at Tokachi Oki, Japan (16 May 1968, Magnitude 7.9), which has long-period components; and the Ofunato earthquake motion recorded at Miyagi-Ken Oki, Japan (12 June 1978, Magnitude 7.4), which has short-period components (Figure 3 [24,25]).…”
Section: Excitation Of Dynamic Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed test procedure and results of the dynamic centrifuge test were comprehensively presented in Jo et al [3]. Thus, this paper only presents a brief description of the experimental model setup and test procedure.…”
Section: Dynamic Centrifuge Testmentioning
confidence: 99%