2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-015-9746-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic behavior of three-leaf stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: Shaking table tests on a two-storey masonry model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests for Non-Seismic Load Scenarios, Linear Dynamic Spectrum Analysis were respectively done with a spectral response, as well as a Non-Linear Static Seismic Analysis (called Push-Over) [3], [19], [20]. In the Linear Dynamic Spectrum Analysis, in accordance with the national regulations [18], the vibration modes taken into account had to involve a mass >5 % of the total mass of the structure, and the sum of the total mass involved in the vibration modes considered had to be at least 85 % of the total mass of the structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests for Non-Seismic Load Scenarios, Linear Dynamic Spectrum Analysis were respectively done with a spectral response, as well as a Non-Linear Static Seismic Analysis (called Push-Over) [3], [19], [20]. In the Linear Dynamic Spectrum Analysis, in accordance with the national regulations [18], the vibration modes taken into account had to involve a mass >5 % of the total mass of the structure, and the sum of the total mass involved in the vibration modes considered had to be at least 85 % of the total mass of the structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This matrix is obtained as a form of a linear combination, between the mass and elastic stiffness matrices, as per the Rayleigh assumption. [ 9 ] Vintzileou et al [ 34 ] have determined experimentally the natural frequencies and damping ratios, from the response of the tested models during sine logarithmic sweep excitations. The damping ratio was calculated using the half‐power bandwidth method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, before laminated rubber bearings are used in practical applications, their seismic performance needs to be verified based on the shaking table, which is a specific device for shaking structural models or building components with a simulated seismic wave [5,6]. In general, displacement is a most important parameter to reflect the dynamic response of the shaking table structure, and the contacted linear displacement gauge is the most commonly used transducer to capture displacement changes of the shaking table structure during the shaking experiment [7][8][9]. One of the major shortcomings of the contacted linear displacement gauge is that it can only provide one-dimensional displacement data at a single point on the shaking table structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%