2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Damage Evaluation of Gravity Load Designed Low Rise RC Building Using Non-linear Static Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of great significance to evaluate the seismic performance of buildings [12]. The traditional seismic design method mainly guarantees that a building will not collapse in a great earthquake [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of great significance to evaluate the seismic performance of buildings [12]. The traditional seismic design method mainly guarantees that a building will not collapse in a great earthquake [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los rangos de daño se utilizan para describir el deterioro del edificio, ya que no es práctico tener una escala continua, por tal razón, estos niveles brindan al usuario una comprensión de la condición física del edificio (Halder & Paul, 2016). En la Figura 3, se detalla los estados de daños estructurales para pórticos resistentes a momentos de hormigón armado, típicos de la construcción convencional utilizada para viviendas unifamiliares (FEMA, 2021).…”
Section: Estados De Dañounclassified
“…Due to the advancing computer technology and improvements in the seismic codes, non-linear methods have commonly used by researchers rather than linear approaches (Erdem, 2016;Halder & Paul, 2016). As a result of this situation, nonlinear analysis procedures according to different seismic codes or guidelines are utilized to investigate the structural performances of the existing buildings in recent studies (Aksoylu et al;Masi et al;Vijay et al;2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%