2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic damage state predictions of reinforced concrete structures using stacked long short-term memory neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] machine learning techniques with boosting algorithms is used for response prediction of reinforced concrete frame buildings. In the aforementioned studies and many other similar works [11,12,13,14,15,16], it has been clearly demonstrated that once the machine learning model is properly trained, it can replicate a non-linear finite element model output accurately. It must be noted that a considerable computational effort is expended in the initial training of the machine models to replicate the non-linear behavior of the structure, however, the value in these methods is drawn from the fact once trained subsequent estimation of non-linear prediction are computationally trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] machine learning techniques with boosting algorithms is used for response prediction of reinforced concrete frame buildings. In the aforementioned studies and many other similar works [11,12,13,14,15,16], it has been clearly demonstrated that once the machine learning model is properly trained, it can replicate a non-linear finite element model output accurately. It must be noted that a considerable computational effort is expended in the initial training of the machine models to replicate the non-linear behavior of the structure, however, the value in these methods is drawn from the fact once trained subsequent estimation of non-linear prediction are computationally trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Machine learning models have been widely used in literature of earthquake engineering to tackle different problems, including surrogate modeling [6,11,12,13,14,15,16] . Depending on the available data, objective and the complexity of the problem, available computational expenditure and desired level of accuracy, various machine learning models, like the simplistic multiple linear regression, to the more complex artificial neural networks are available to choose from.…”
Section: Selection Of Suitable Machine Learning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somala et al [ 18 ] showed that in the fundamental period estimation of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames, Ensemble Learning Techniques such as Random Forest and XGBoost could outperform the existing empirical predictive models available in the literature. Ahmed et al [ 19 ] developed a novel long short-term memory network with overlapping data for the accurate prediction of earthquake-induced damage in ductile and non-ductile frame structures. Ni et al [ 20 ] generated fragility curves for buried pipelines using Lasso Regression Analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they constitute a general and flexible modeling tool for prediction. It comes as no surprise that many engineering disciplines are witnessing an intense engagement with neural network models to solve a broad range of challenging problems [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%