2018 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bigdataservice.2018.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Data Classification Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [56] examined the impact of deep learning algorithms for classification of earthquake precursors for extraction of seismic patterns and unique features from big data. Reference [57] distinguished between seismic signals and non seismic signals using logistic regression method on the data collected from National Seismological Network of Colombia. Reference [58] applied Support Vector regression and Hybrid neural Network for earthquake prediction in Hindukush, Chile and Southern California regions with prediction accuracy rate of 82.7%, 84.9%, 90.6% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference [56] examined the impact of deep learning algorithms for classification of earthquake precursors for extraction of seismic patterns and unique features from big data. Reference [57] distinguished between seismic signals and non seismic signals using logistic regression method on the data collected from National Seismological Network of Colombia. Reference [58] applied Support Vector regression and Hybrid neural Network for earthquake prediction in Hindukush, Chile and Southern California regions with prediction accuracy rate of 82.7%, 84.9%, 90.6% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For probablistic forcasts, multiple artificial intelligence methods have been exercised for making earthquake predictions. Comparitive studies have been conducted [13], systematic methods of predicate logic have also been applied to analyze the precursor that may have vital importance for earthquake prediction [9,27,32,57,65]. To estimate the mutual relationship of precursors, regression line has been calculated [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LDA was tested for classifying seismic signals with the goal of differentiating earthquakes from man-made explosions [38]. The RF was used in the classification of earthquake and non-earthquake signals [39] and the SVM was used to perform classification of volcanic events [18].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] RBFNN Energy, mg., b-value, etc. [105] Time series data [106] dpt., ssd., mg., la., lo., Mc [107] Month, day and the F-E seismic regions [3] PNN te,Āe, Ee, dAe dt (dB), ∆e,te, δAe, ρ [108] [109] KNN, NB, SVM, DT, ANN Seismicity indicators, increments of b-value [110] DT, SVM, RF, LR Maximum amplitude, sd., start and end time, etc. [111] RF, ANN, SVM Sixty different seismic features.…”
Section: Cheraghi and Ghanbarimentioning
confidence: 99%