2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Enhancement of Welded Unreinforced Flange-Bolted Web Steel Moment Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a) [20]. This indicates that similar to the RBS connection tested by Yu et al [9] ( This buckling damage is similar to those observed in previously studied WSMCs like the RBS and WUF-W [9,4] and have also been observed in other connections modified with the HBS [21]. In other words, the buckling damage discussed above for HBS beams is not induced because of the softening of material from the heat treatment or by the connection method, but it is a characteristic behavior of the wide flange cross section.…”
Section: Buckling Of Recently Developed Seismically Resilient Wsmcssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5a) [20]. This indicates that similar to the RBS connection tested by Yu et al [9] ( This buckling damage is similar to those observed in previously studied WSMCs like the RBS and WUF-W [9,4] and have also been observed in other connections modified with the HBS [21]. In other words, the buckling damage discussed above for HBS beams is not induced because of the softening of material from the heat treatment or by the connection method, but it is a characteristic behavior of the wide flange cross section.…”
Section: Buckling Of Recently Developed Seismically Resilient Wsmcssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The heat-treated beam section (HBS) WSMC has been recently developed and validated in other studies [20,21], however, for convenience a brief description of the HBS concept and application is presented here. This brief description is followed by a presentation of experimental data from recently tested HBS WSMCs demonstrating HBS seismic performance and local buckling strength degradation mechanism.…”
Section: Buckling Of Recently Developed Seismically Resilient Wsmcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although steel joints were seriously damaged in previous earthquakes (Popov et al, 1998), the Chinese and US codes have provided detailed provisions for the design of steel joints to avoid joint-failure-induced collapse (ANSI/AISC 360-16, 2016; GB 50017-2017, 2017). Moreover, Morrison et al (2016) also proved that the improved joints used after the Northridge Earthquake did not lose strength significantly under earthquakes, which means that the damage to the connection can be avoided with the plastic hinge relocation and capacity design. Therefore, connection damage of the joints was not considered in the collapse simulation.…”
Section: Nonlinear Time-history Analysesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For cracking analysis, employing the widely used solid element model is time consuming (Khan et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2016). Moreover, local buckling is the dominating damage and is more prone to induce structural collapse than cracking in a seismic disaster (Morrison et al, 2016). Hence, the local buckling behavior of steel components is primarily studied rather than element cracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic performance of the reduced beam section (RBS) with a bolted web connection (RBS-B) has been investigated (Lee et al 2005). An improved RBS-B connection considering the redistribution of web bending stresses to the flange (Lee and Kim 2007) and combined-validated heat-treated beam sections (Morrison et al 2016) has been proposed and exhibits excellent connection rotation capacity. However, although the moment transfer efficiency of bolted web connections and cyclic performance under incremental loading amplitude have been evaluated, the effect of bolted web connection moment transfer efficiency on cyclic performance under a large number of minor inelastic cycles remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%