2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic evidence for a steeply dipping reflector—stagnant slab in the mantle transition zone

Abstract: . (2015): Seismic evidence for a steeply dipping reflector--stagnant slab in the mantle transition zone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been used in global seismology for the detection and location of heterogeneities in the Earth mantle that cause scattering and/or reflection of seismic waves (e.g. Kaneshima, 2009Kaneshima, , 2016Kaneshima & Helffrich, 2003;Rost et al, 2008;Schumacher & Thomas, 2016;Schumacher et al, 2018;Weber and Wicks, 1996;Weber et al, 2015;Wicks and Weber, 1996;Wright, 1972;Wright & Muirhead, 1969).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach has been used in global seismology for the detection and location of heterogeneities in the Earth mantle that cause scattering and/or reflection of seismic waves (e.g. Kaneshima, 2009Kaneshima, , 2016Kaneshima & Helffrich, 2003;Rost et al, 2008;Schumacher & Thomas, 2016;Schumacher et al, 2018;Weber and Wicks, 1996;Weber et al, 2015;Wicks and Weber, 1996;Wright, 1972;Wright & Muirhead, 1969).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…allow us to use and analyze the S-coda as an independent proof of the imaged reflector as shown by Weber and Wicks, (1996) and Weber et al (2015) for the detections of heterogeneities at the larger scale of the Earth's mantle. S-to-S reflections would arrive at travel time of at least 35 ms, while our recording last 32.768 ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Weber et al [2015] challenged the interpretation of Kaneshima and Helffrich [1998]. Using events #7, 10, 12, and two more recent events, they suggested the presence of a reflector near 400 km depth, instead of the scatterer K2 located around 1600 km depth (which probably corresponds to the scatterer #27 in Table 2).…”
Section: 1002/2015jb012432mentioning
confidence: 99%