2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0109-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges considering multi-dimensional performance limit state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inelastic rotation has been found to gradually reduce the stiffness and rigidity of the pier when they are subjected to seismic loads. It is thought that a reliable indicator of the damage is the ductility that results from inelastic rotation in the plastic hinge generated at the fixity points of piers [24]. The column ductility requirement is, by definition, stated as follows: 𝜑 = 𝜃 𝜃 𝑦 (13) where θy represents the equivalent rotation at the yield point and θ represents the rotation of pier in its plastic hinge.…”
Section: Damage Metrics and Threshold Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inelastic rotation has been found to gradually reduce the stiffness and rigidity of the pier when they are subjected to seismic loads. It is thought that a reliable indicator of the damage is the ductility that results from inelastic rotation in the plastic hinge generated at the fixity points of piers [24]. The column ductility requirement is, by definition, stated as follows: 𝜑 = 𝜃 𝜃 𝑦 (13) where θy represents the equivalent rotation at the yield point and θ represents the rotation of pier in its plastic hinge.…”
Section: Damage Metrics and Threshold Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragility analysis is widely used for the seismic vulnerability assessment of structures Here, N e is the number of the selected seismic records on each site; N g is the number of the seismic records scaled from 0.05 g to 1.0 g with an increment of 0.05 g; N case is the total number of the HSR pier models; and T com is the required calculation time for seismic analysis of the HSR pier model (sec). [18]. The fragility curves represent the damage probability of structures at a given earthquake intensity, which is described by the lognormal cumulative distribution function [38,39].…”
Section: Efficiency Comparison According To the Flowcharts Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can reflect the probability of the structures exceeding a critical value under a specific seismic intensity [15]. The different methodologies, such as the nonlinear time history analysis and the Pushover analysis, are widely adopted for the seismic fragility analysis of the highway bridge [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The nonlinear time history analysis is more reliable and accurate, while the Pushover analysis has the distinct advantages of the conceptual simplicity and the computational effectiveness [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that bridge structures can present structural damage after seismic loading, some authors propose methodologies to estimate safety levels in bridges expressed in terms of fragility curves: Choi and Jeon (2003) evaluates the fragility of bridges and retrofit measures to increase the seismic resistance of the bridge structures; Kim and Feng (2003) estimates fragility curves considering different intensity measures; fragility curves are calculated in different kinds of bridges and zones in the United States (Choi et al 2004;Pan et al 2007); analytical fragility analysis is proposed for different components of the bridge structure (Padgett and DesRoches 2008). Wang et al (2012) estimates fragility curves considering multidimensional performance limit state parameters in concrete bridges; a multivariate fragility analysis is made considering the uncertainties in the seismic loadings (Wang et al 2018); the effect of the cumulative damage by seismic loadings is taken into account in the fragility analysis (Cui et al 2019;Panchireddi and Ghosh 2019;Tolentino et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%