2014
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic fragility assessment of a tall reinforced concrete chimney

Abstract: Summary In China, a considerable proportion of reinforced concrete (RC) industrial chimneys in operation was designed and constructed in accordance with less rigorous outdated seismic criteria during the end of 19th and early 20th century. However, few research works have been reported till date on a realistic overall assessment of the seismic performance of these existing aging RC chimney structures. Therefore, in this study, fragilities of existing RC chimney were studied. For this purpose, an existing 240 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free‐standing RC chimney structure is 240 m high, and the inside diameter varies between 22.94 m at the base and 7.34 m at the top. The site soil is Class III according to new seismic code of China (China Ministry of Construction, 2010), and it is the equal of National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program class D. The design peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 0.1 g, and maximum considered earthquake of PGA is 0.22 g. More detailed geometric parameters of the chimney structure are described in Zhou's paper …”
Section: Chimney Characteristics and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The free‐standing RC chimney structure is 240 m high, and the inside diameter varies between 22.94 m at the base and 7.34 m at the top. The site soil is Class III according to new seismic code of China (China Ministry of Construction, 2010), and it is the equal of National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program class D. The design peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 0.1 g, and maximum considered earthquake of PGA is 0.22 g. More detailed geometric parameters of the chimney structure are described in Zhou's paper …”
Section: Chimney Characteristics and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the damage area of RC circular hollow high‐pier appears not only at the bottom of the pier but also in the middle of the pier and on the top of the pier in earthquake, and the vulnerability at the bottom of the pier is higher than that of other areas. Zhou et al studied the fragility of a 240‐m‐height RC chimney under one‐dimensional ground motion and obtained the damage probability of the chimney structure under a particular intensity of ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e e ect of NFGMs along the vertical direction on the behaviors of other types of chimney structures (steel chimney and masonry chimney) should be studied. In order to reduce computation cost, a twodimensional model was created for the chimney structure as done in Zhou et al [8] in this work. In future research, it is suggested to create a three-dimensional model to simulate chimney structure to enhance the accuracy of calculation results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkeli et al [7] studied the response of RC chimneys under wind and earthquake loads and showed that the opening at the body of the chimney can cause brittle failure. Zhou et al [8] evaluated the damage probability of a high-rise RC chimney with a height of 240 m under seismic loads through seismic fragility analysis (SFA), and some meaningful conclusions were obtained in their study. However, the influence of the vertical component of the ground motions was not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karaca et al [18] carried out the dynamic responses of chimneys after FRP strengthening. Zhou et al [19] revealed that the RC chimney structure had considerable ductility and could withstand a strong earthquake with some structural damage using fragility analysis. Gorski [20] investigated the influence of the three components mentioned above on the total cross-wind response of the chimney.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%