2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-018-0481-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic fragility of structures isolated by single concave sliding devices for different soil conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29,30] Like the TMDs, the efficiency of BI systems highly depends on the characteristics of the fixed-base superstructure, the control system (isolators in this case), and the input excitation. [17,21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37] For example, Anajafi and Medina [21] showed that under narrowband excitations, the BI technique is effective only when the fixed-base superstructure is stiffer than the soil profile. In another studies, Matsagar and Jangid [32] and Kulkarni and Jangid [36] illustrated that for nonlinear BI systems, the response of the structure is significantly influenced by the hysteretic response of the isolator bearings.…”
Section: Robustness Of Common Passive Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29,30] Like the TMDs, the efficiency of BI systems highly depends on the characteristics of the fixed-base superstructure, the control system (isolators in this case), and the input excitation. [17,21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37] For example, Anajafi and Medina [21] showed that under narrowband excitations, the BI technique is effective only when the fixed-base superstructure is stiffer than the soil profile. In another studies, Matsagar and Jangid [32] and Kulkarni and Jangid [36] illustrated that for nonlinear BI systems, the response of the structure is significantly influenced by the hysteretic response of the isolator bearings.…”
Section: Robustness Of Common Passive Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BI systems can decouple dynamic responses of a building from the horizontal components of ground excitations by interposing low‐horizontal stiffness bearings at the isolation interface . Like the TMDs, the efficiency of BI systems highly depends on the characteristics of the fixed‐base superstructure, the control system (isolators in this case), and the input excitation . For example, Anajafi and Medina showed that under narrowband excitations, the BI technique is effective only when the fixed‐base superstructure is stiffer than the soil profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laminated rubber bearings are the most commonly used due to their simple structure, stable performance, and favorable effect of seismic isolation 7–9 . FPS bearings are also extensively used because they can decouple the isolation period from the deck mass and perform well when subjected to large earthquake excitations 10,11 . The SIBs dissipate seismic energy primarily by doing work with restoring force, so their force–displacement relationship usually exhibits nonlinearity, which can be simulated by the bilinear hysteresis model or smooth hysteresis model such as the Bouc–Wen model 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang Ruifa [6] used the multi-friction pendulum system (MFPS) to analyze the seismic response of an isolated vertical cylindrical large liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage tank, and proposed an ultra-large liquefied natural gas storage tank isolated by the MFPS tank. Castaldo P. [7] used a two-degree-of-freedom model considering the flexibility of the superstructure to analyze the seismic reliability of the friction pendulum system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%