2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-005-1148-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Hazards Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites in Regions of Low Seismic Activity

Abstract: Abstract. A comparative tectonic quiescence and lack of earthquakes make the stable centres of continents attractive for siting long-term radioactive waste storage facilities. The low rates of deformation in such regions, however, make it difficult to characterize their long-term seismotectonic behaviour, leading to uncertain estimates for the very low probability hazard estimates required by society. In an attempt to overcome the deficiency of both contemporary seismicity and paleoseismic data in central Cana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stable Cratonic Regions (SCR) of the intraplate cratonic environments also referred as stable cratonic cores (Fenton et al, 2006) are the areas where no large earthquake or abundant paleoearthquakes are evidenced similar to the area of the present study. In the SCR paleoearthquakes may cause minor tilting of fault bounded blocks, giving rise to geomorphic anomalies for which there are not likely depositional and erosional explanation (Schumm et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The Stable Cratonic Regions (SCR) of the intraplate cratonic environments also referred as stable cratonic cores (Fenton et al, 2006) are the areas where no large earthquake or abundant paleoearthquakes are evidenced similar to the area of the present study. In the SCR paleoearthquakes may cause minor tilting of fault bounded blocks, giving rise to geomorphic anomalies for which there are not likely depositional and erosional explanation (Schumm et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…From investigations of similar geological areas around the world, the expected maximum magnitude of a tectonic-origin seismic event in Gauteng could be in the order of 6.8 (Fenton et al, 2006). However, most seismic hazard models in South Africa, without taking the potential effects of acid mine water into consideration, estimate an expected maximum magnitude of 5.5 for the Gauteng region due to normal mining activities (Davies and Kijko, 2003).…”
Section: Proposed Approach To Seismic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, strong devastating earthquakes in them also occur. Estimated probabilities of extreme events (M ≥ 7) for the sites recommended for radioactive waste disposal in the shields of ancient platforms, though uncertain, are very low (Fenton et al, 2006). The time of the existence of high-seismicity zones along the boundaries of tectonic plates and, hence, the low-seismicity regions located between these zones within the plates is hundreds of millions of years (geotectonic megacycles), which far exceeds the reasonable period of safety assessment for long-lived radioactive waste repositories.…”
Section: Geotectonic Position Of a Repository Site And Seismic Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%