2011
DOI: 10.2174/1874836801105010061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Mitigation of a Historic Masonry Building

Abstract: Abstract:This work presents an analysis of different proposals of rehabilitation of a masonry building, built around the beginning of the XX century for public schools, in the highest seismic risk zone of Argentine; and which was closed down after Mendoza`s Earthquake in 1985. The building has masonry walls of artisanal ceramic bricks and wood-framed roof but it does not have lateral ties. Currently, it gives evidence of structural pathologies due to various seismic events and the lack of maintenance by water … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…With the experimental results achieved, a finite element model is formulated using the Abaqus software [16] whose parameters allow to obtain a behaviour similar to that observed during the tests. Comparison between stress state modelling and building damage status [17]. Damage due settlements of different sectors [18].…”
Section: Masonry Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the experimental results achieved, a finite element model is formulated using the Abaqus software [16] whose parameters allow to obtain a behaviour similar to that observed during the tests. Comparison between stress state modelling and building damage status [17]. Damage due settlements of different sectors [18].…”
Section: Masonry Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the results from Figure 9. Simulation of facade damage due to inefficient foundation [17].…”
Section: Masonry Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regulations have been mostly based on the analysis of the response of masonry of standard thickness, with the analysis of the behavior of ceramic masonry walls of great thickness being almost null to date (CIRSOC 501, 2007), as well as its international standardization (Maldonado et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%