2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic monitoring of CO 2 geosequestration: CO2CRC Otway case study using full 4D FDTD approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test our workflow, we compute the vertical component of particle velocity for corresponding offset VSP gathers using 2D finite-difference time-domain approach and invert them. The model we use was designed to replicate the geological conditions of the Otway site (Glubokovskikh et al, 2016), where the field dataset was acquired. The acquisition geometry is similar to the actual field geometry.…”
Section: Synthetic Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test our workflow, we compute the vertical component of particle velocity for corresponding offset VSP gathers using 2D finite-difference time-domain approach and invert them. The model we use was designed to replicate the geological conditions of the Otway site (Glubokovskikh et al, 2016), where the field dataset was acquired. The acquisition geometry is similar to the actual field geometry.…”
Section: Synthetic Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, application of AGC in a workflow is controversial. Our modelling study shows that AGC for high-fold dataset such as the one under consideration can preserve spatial distribution of reflectivity change in stacked domain (Glubokovskikh, et al 2016) while AGC will distort AVO response in the presence of strong remnants of the ground roll present on small offsets. As the goal is to obtain stacked migrated volumes we keep AGC in the workflow.…”
Section: Initial Workflowmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We tested different hyperparameters and chose the ones that Figure 2: (a) The Otway velocity model (Glubokovskikh et al, 2016) used to generate data for the baseline, (b) the reservoir signal and near-surface noise added to the baseline for the monitor data, and (c) zoom into the random Gaussian 4D noise with 50 m/s mean and 100 m/s standard deviation changes in the first 20 m depth.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%