2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9559-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of masonry residential buildings in Lorca’s city centre, after the 11th May 2011 earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the regional modifiers for the building typologies in Ciutat Vella. These coefficients have been defined from the Barcelona regional modifiers proposed by Lantada (2007) and Lantada et al (2010) adapted for L'Eixample district in Valencia by Guardiola-Víllora and Basset-Salom (2015), as well as from the studies of the performance of masonry and RC buildings damaged during Lorca May 11 th 2011 earthquake (Feriche et al 2012, Basset-Salom and Guardiola-Víllora 2014, Martinez-Cuevas and Gaspar-Escribano 2016. The behaviour modifiers, Vm, take into account the contribution to the vulnerability index of factors related to the building itself and to its location within in the block, therefore their applicability depends strongly on the level of detailed information available for the building stock.…”
Section: = Vi*+ Vr+ Vmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the regional modifiers for the building typologies in Ciutat Vella. These coefficients have been defined from the Barcelona regional modifiers proposed by Lantada (2007) and Lantada et al (2010) adapted for L'Eixample district in Valencia by Guardiola-Víllora and Basset-Salom (2015), as well as from the studies of the performance of masonry and RC buildings damaged during Lorca May 11 th 2011 earthquake (Feriche et al 2012, Basset-Salom and Guardiola-Víllora 2014, Martinez-Cuevas and Gaspar-Escribano 2016. The behaviour modifiers, Vm, take into account the contribution to the vulnerability index of factors related to the building itself and to its location within in the block, therefore their applicability depends strongly on the level of detailed information available for the building stock.…”
Section: = Vi*+ Vr+ Vmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, reconnaissance reports from past events have highlighted situations in which nearby structures shared similar typological characteristics, yet very different damage levels. 2,3 Amongst many others, such variations may be explained by the randomness associated to the mechanical properties of the materials, structural interventions, variability in the soil conditions, or the different orientation of similar buildings vis-à-vis incoming seismic waves. The latter aspect is commonly known as the directionality effect, and there is evidence that it is a fairly strong aspect of ground motions recorded in short to moderate distances from the rupture (e.g., see 4 on the 2010-2011 Canterbury events).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They lead to a high variability on the estimated structural damage due to an earthquake. For instance, reconnaissance reports from past events have highlighted situations in which nearby structures shared similar typological characteristics, yet very different damage levels 2,3 . Amongst many others, such variations may be explained by the randomness associated to the mechanical properties of the materials, structural interventions, variability in the soil conditions, or the different orientation of similar buildings vis‐à‐vis incoming seismic waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of recent earthquakes affecting urban city centres (L'Aquila, 2009, Lorca, 2011, Emilia Romagna, 2012, Katmandu, 2015, Amatrice, 2016, Bagan, 2016 has highlighted the need to assess the seismic risk, even in low to moderate seismic hazard countries in which less strong earthquakes can, nonetheless, cause severe damage, due to the high vulnerability of the buildings. The main reason is that many buildings don't meet the requirements to withstand seismic actions, neglecting, in addition, other factors which are relevant for an adequate seismic performance such as geometric or stiffness regularities (Basset-Salom et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%