2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of RC frames with EPSC latticed concrete infill walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [ 13 ] established a finite element model to investigate the effects of strain rates on the seismic responses of reinforced concrete structures with ABAQUS platform, and the numerical results were validated by the experimental data of the shaking table test. Tang et al [ 14 , 15 ] carried out shaking table tests and, in numerical studies on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames with latticed concrete infill walls, the simulated acceleration, displacement response, and tensive damage of the model structure have good agreement with the test records. Jiang et al [ 16 ] performed a numerical simulation to analyze the seismic performance of superimposed reinforced concrete shear wall, the distribution of concrete damage, steel reinforcement stress distribution, and hysteretic curves in the numerical simulation were basically consistent with the results of the pseudo-static test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Zhang et al [ 13 ] established a finite element model to investigate the effects of strain rates on the seismic responses of reinforced concrete structures with ABAQUS platform, and the numerical results were validated by the experimental data of the shaking table test. Tang et al [ 14 , 15 ] carried out shaking table tests and, in numerical studies on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames with latticed concrete infill walls, the simulated acceleration, displacement response, and tensive damage of the model structure have good agreement with the test records. Jiang et al [ 16 ] performed a numerical simulation to analyze the seismic performance of superimposed reinforced concrete shear wall, the distribution of concrete damage, steel reinforcement stress distribution, and hysteretic curves in the numerical simulation were basically consistent with the results of the pseudo-static test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In general, the damage degree of infill walls with flexible connection between the RC frame and the infill walls under the action of an earthquake is lower than that of a rigid connection between the RC frame and the infill walls. The degree of seismic damage to the wall decreases with the decrease in the tie bar spacing (Tang et al, 2019). A study by Cheng and Liu (2011) investigated the out-of-plane stability of four sets of two-layer infill walls in a frame through a shaking test, in which four different connection modes between the RC frame and the infill walls were adopted, including inclined bricks at the top of walls under rigid connection, disconnection, flexibility, as well as semi-flexibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage is achieved when the polymer can be substituted with its recycled version. Such beneficial propertyembedding makes these materials suitable for vibration dampers or anti-earthquake protections [19,20]. This class of materials is known as interpenetrating phase composites (IPC) and there are at least two phases that are three dimensional interconnected, generating a topologically continuous network throughout the microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%