2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of simple steel frames with buckling-restrained knee braces & SMA to reduce residual displacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that SMA can improve the dynamic response of structures subjected to earthquake excitations, but the energy dissipation of structures with the BRB system was higher than that of structures with the SMA bracing system. Fahiminia et al [122] used BRKB in two structures with different numbers of layers and added SMA to the core of BRKB. Subsequently, nonlinear time-history analysis of the two structures was carried out, and the results showed that adding SMA to the BRKBs can reduce the residual deformations of the frames by more than 50%.…”
Section: Seismic Retrofittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result showed that SMA can improve the dynamic response of structures subjected to earthquake excitations, but the energy dissipation of structures with the BRB system was higher than that of structures with the SMA bracing system. Fahiminia et al [122] used BRKB in two structures with different numbers of layers and added SMA to the core of BRKB. Subsequently, nonlinear time-history analysis of the two structures was carried out, and the results showed that adding SMA to the BRKBs can reduce the residual deformations of the frames by more than 50%.…”
Section: Seismic Retrofittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of a NiTi SMA model that are frequently used in the earthquake engineering community 24,30,52–63 (hereafter, referred to as the conventional model) are shown in Figure 2. The required model parameters for the conventional model are EA, ET, σFs, σRf, and εT, as shown in Figure 2A.…”
Section: Modeling the Functional Degradation Of Niti Shape Memory Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a new kind of BRKB based on shape memory alloy (SMA) has also been investigated for improved seismic performance. SMA material was used as the yielding core of BRKBs for its self-recentering ability, high stiffness, and good energy dissipation (Fahiminia and Zahrai, 2020; Qui et al, 2022). Because of the high cost of SMA material, short-length BRKBs are well suited for optimum use of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%