1995
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.1995010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic reservoir monitoring over the Oseberg Field during period 1989-1992

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with an extension of the gas zone during production, as shown for the 1989–1992 period by Johnstad et al . (1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are consistent with an extension of the gas zone during production, as shown for the 1989–1992 period by Johnstad et al . (1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A previous feasibility study on synthetic seismic data indicated that variations in the saturation of the reservoir due to production would give rise to subtle but noticeable effects on seismic response, particularly amplitude changes. Previous studies on 4D seismic monitoring from 1989 to 1992 can be found in Johnstad, Seymour and Smith (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and a lower part with faults and tilted blocks (Cretaceous and older) (Johnstad et al 1995). From a geological point of view, we can distinguish a strati®ed overburden, with local 2-D or 3-D structures (shale diapirism?)…”
Section: North Sea Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from different 4D seismic case studies so far indicate that the areal consistency of various seismic features is robust with respect to noise, and useful information can be obtained even if the baseline survey is old. Some recent examples from the North Sea are the Oseberg study (Johnstad et al 1995), the Magnus time lapse study (Watts et al 1996), the Fulmar study (Johnston et al 1997). Earlier presentations of the Gullfaks 4D study can be found in Sønneland et al (1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%