Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2017
DOI: 10.7712/120117.5531.17692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Resilience Assessment of the Western Macedonia Highway Network in Greece

Abstract: Retis-Risk is a comprehensive framework recently developed for the assessment and management of the seismic resilience of interurban roadway networks. In this paper, this framework is applied for the road network of the prefecture of Western Macedonia in Greece. Refined data concerning real traffic conditions and network topology were collected and a detailed network mapping was performed in GIS. Utilizing an ad-hoc developed software for implementing the holistic methodology, the as-built road network was ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the problem is usually addressed by considering single seismic scenarios derived deterministically or from disaggregation of PSHA-generated seismic hazard maps. Another approach is proposed by Sextos et al [170], where seismic scenarios associated with specific return periods are produced by PSHA for each seismic source independently. Appropriate IMs for assessing pipeline network loss are discussed in Section 4.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the problem is usually addressed by considering single seismic scenarios derived deterministically or from disaggregation of PSHA-generated seismic hazard maps. Another approach is proposed by Sextos et al [170], where seismic scenarios associated with specific return periods are produced by PSHA for each seismic source independently. Appropriate IMs for assessing pipeline network loss are discussed in Section 4.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24) by using appropriate normal CDFs to model the recovery phase, depending on the damage state. In Sextos et al[170], where intercity networks are addressed, resilience-centered time-dependent qualitative loss indicators of binary form are introduced to track the over-time variation of direct and indirect losses not easily quantifiable in monetary terms (here: connectivity, accessibility, environment), and their effect on the functionality metric. The previous two approaches are examples of transportation networks linking structural, geotechnical with network and consequence analysis that can be potentially adapted to the case of pipeline networks after appropriate modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%