2019
DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response of RC buildings subjected to fling‐step in the near‐fault region

Abstract: Fling-step and forward directivity are the major consequences of near-fault ground motions as they can impose unexpected seismic demands on structures located in the vicinity of the fault. The pernicious effect of forward directivity on the seismic behavior of structures has been studied widely. However, not much research has been conducted to investigate the influence of fling-step that is related to a large co-seismic displacement. Moreover, the inconsistent results reported in the literature create a scient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What matters here is the kind of earthquake loading characteristics. Characters of strong ground motions (GMs) may considerably vary in terms of source mechanism, rupture propagation, frequency contents, energy, etc., [26]. Strong ground motions in the vicinity of causative fault can cause severe structural demands because of exerting high input energy in a short duration [27].…”
Section: Earthquake Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What matters here is the kind of earthquake loading characteristics. Characters of strong ground motions (GMs) may considerably vary in terms of source mechanism, rupture propagation, frequency contents, energy, etc., [26]. Strong ground motions in the vicinity of causative fault can cause severe structural demands because of exerting high input energy in a short duration [27].…”
Section: Earthquake Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite displacement‐based damage indices, the energy damage index can play a significant role in long‐duration and pulsive ground motions. For example, sequential ground motions such as mainshock–aftershock and near‐field earthquakes 29–37 . The total input energy of the system is determined as the total energy demand produced by earthquake ground motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sequential ground motions such as mainshock-aftershock and near-field earthquakes. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] The total input energy of the system is determined as the total energy demand produced by earthquake ground motions. According to the energy balance equation, some part of the input energy is stored in the form of kinematic and strain energy, and the other ones are dissipated in the form of damping and hysteretic energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impulsive signals can increase the damage of structures and infrastructure located in near fault regions; this has been evidenced after many earthquakes and analyzed in various studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Research on the effects of impulsive ground motion on engineered structures is quite well developed; a short, non-exhaustive review, that can be used as a starting point for further research studies, points out works concerning different structural typologies, namely: seismically base-isolated structures [16][17][18][19][20], bridges [21][22][23][24][25], reinforce concrete or steel moment designed structures [5,[26][27][28][29], and low-and mid-rise masonry buildings [30]. In Italy, extensive damage occurred mainly where the structures were old and built without engineering design; such situations occur commonly in historical centers and heritage buildings, such as churches and bell towers; anyhow, the damage was also recognized in buildings with engineering design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%