2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic visibility of melt at the core-mantle boundary from PKKP diffracted waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not contradict the results of Russell et al. (2022) as PKKP diff phases are only sensitive to V p , while normal modes are also sensitive to V s and ρ . The 1–2 km of −33% V p that fits the PKKP diff observations is consistent with the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This does not contradict the results of Russell et al. (2022) as PKKP diff phases are only sensitive to V p , while normal modes are also sensitive to V s and ρ . The 1–2 km of −33% V p that fits the PKKP diff observations is consistent with the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The suggestion that such a low velocity layer might exist globally just above the CMB, but that it is often invisible to seismic data, has been made before, most recently by Russell et al. (2022). In our case, event 1 provides exceptionally clear signals, allowing such a very thin low‐velocity layer to be resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures have been most abundantly discovered beneath mantle plumes and around LLSVPs beneath the Pacific and Africa [24,25,27,29]. Geodynamic work has further suggested that these mountain-scale structures may form from a thin layer [6,68] that could be difficult to detect seismically [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%