1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9201(98)00165-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismicity of oceanic and continental rifts—a geodynamic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic and geodetic measurements over the last decade have revealed that plate boundary strain can be accommodated by a spectrum of fault slip behavior (e.g., Miller et al, ; Peng & Gomberg, ; Wech et al, ). While earthquakes are the most dramatic end member of that spectrum, it has become increasingly clear that aseismic slip over a variety of timescales contributes significantly to total fault displacement in some tectonic settings (e.g., Bird et al, ; Dragert et al, ; Frohlich & Wetzel, ; Schwartz & Rokosky, ; Sobolev & Rundquist, ; Vidale & Houston, ). Understanding the partitioning of seismic versus aseismic displacement on faults is important from a hazards perspective, as unquantified aseismic slip adds uncertainty to risk assessments for faults with the potential to generate large earthquakes (e.g., Dixon et al, ; Linde et al, ; Linde & Silver, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic and geodetic measurements over the last decade have revealed that plate boundary strain can be accommodated by a spectrum of fault slip behavior (e.g., Miller et al, ; Peng & Gomberg, ; Wech et al, ). While earthquakes are the most dramatic end member of that spectrum, it has become increasingly clear that aseismic slip over a variety of timescales contributes significantly to total fault displacement in some tectonic settings (e.g., Bird et al, ; Dragert et al, ; Frohlich & Wetzel, ; Schwartz & Rokosky, ; Sobolev & Rundquist, ; Vidale & Houston, ). Understanding the partitioning of seismic versus aseismic displacement on faults is important from a hazards perspective, as unquantified aseismic slip adds uncertainty to risk assessments for faults with the potential to generate large earthquakes (e.g., Dixon et al, ; Linde et al, ; Linde & Silver, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowie et al [1993] later argued that seismic slip had to represent an insignificant fraction (<1%) of the time-averaged fault slip rate at the fast-spreading East Pacific Rise. Subsequent studies documented an exponential decrease in seismic moment release rates, and thus seismically accommodated strain, between slow and fast spreading centers [Sobolev and Rundquist, 1999;Rundquist and Sobolev, 2002;Bird et al, 2002;Frohlich and Wetzel, 2007]. This article is protected by copyright.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, OTF seismic coupling varies between 10% and 30%; however, coupling may vary significantly along strike [ Boettcher and Jordan , ]. Earlier studies noted a decrease in coupling with spreading rate [e.g., Kawaski et al ., ; Sobolev and Rundquist , ; Bird et al ., ; Rundquist and Sobolev , ]. Using estimated fault length and slip rate values, the observed rupture area of the largest OTF earthquakes is less than the total area above the inferred 600°C isotherm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%