2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(99)00081-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismicity, seismotectonics and seismic hazard of Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Romeo and Pugliese, 2000;Pace et al, 2006;Akinci et al, 2009) and the horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) hazard level is found to be in the order of 0.25g for a return period of 475 years. Deaggregation analysis by Akinci et al (2009) indicates that the 475 year PGA hazard at L'Aquila is largely controlled by large earthquakes (M W 6.5-6.7) on faults oriented parallel to the dominant structural trend.…”
Section: The L'aquila Event and Seismic Hazard In The Central Apenninesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romeo and Pugliese, 2000;Pace et al, 2006;Akinci et al, 2009) and the horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) hazard level is found to be in the order of 0.25g for a return period of 475 years. Deaggregation analysis by Akinci et al (2009) indicates that the 475 year PGA hazard at L'Aquila is largely controlled by large earthquakes (M W 6.5-6.7) on faults oriented parallel to the dominant structural trend.…”
Section: The L'aquila Event and Seismic Hazard In The Central Apenninesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several statistical models were used and tested, including exponential, Gaussian (Rikitake, 1974), Lognormal (Nishenko and Buland, 1987), Gamma (Utsu, 1984) and Weibull (Hagiwara, 1974) distributions. Among them lognormal was found better to apply to Italian historical data ( Romeo and Pugliese, 2000). Nevertheless, a modification of the lognormal distribution was applied to compute earthquake probabilities (Brownian passage time (BPT) distribution, Ellsworth et al, 1998;Matthews et al, 2002) due to its peculiar properties.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They justified the low values of the conditional probabilities obtained (@0.1) with the observation that current lifetimes used in the prediction (10-50 years, on average) are too small compared to the seismic cycle of active faults in Italy, whose average recurrence times are of the order of several hundreds to some thousands of years. Romeo and Pugliese (2000) focused attention on a more detailed seismotectonic zoning of Italy and calculated the probability that strong earthquakes (M ‡ 6.4) with a lognormal distribution of the interevent times, could occur in 27 out of 81 seismic source zones in the period 1997-2026; they also computed for the whole country the conditional probability of a peak ground acceleration exceeding 0.2 g. The most hazardous area was concentrated across the boundary between Umbria and Marche administrative Regions, where effectively the 1997 Assisi earthquake shook the ground with accelerations as high as 0.5 g.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) was VIII (MM) in the epicentral area of about 170 km 2 (Gao et al 2005). Moreover, using a paleoearthquake magnitude range from 6.6 to 7.5, the epicentral intensity is estimated to be from about X to less than XII (MM) using the simple equation of epicentral intensity (I o ) and surface wave magnitude (M s = 1.06 + 0.56 I o ± 0.37, Romeo and Pugliese 2000). Therefore, the intensity in the paleomeizoseismal area could reasonably have been larger than IX (MM), and seismic intensity in a majority of the Xilinhot district likely would be higher than VI (MM).…”
Section: Seismic Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%