2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismological evidence of an active footwall shortcut thrust in the Northern Itoigawa–Shizuoka Tectonic Line derived by the aftershock sequence of the 2014 M 6.7 Northern Nagano earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the 22 November 2014 M6.2 Northern Nagano earthquake (National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster [NIED] centroid location 36.689°N ; 137.890°E), which is located 3.9 km from the Hi‐net station HBAH, to establish the calibration factor. The earthquake ruptured to the surface, but the highest moment release was at 5‐km depth (NIED, Panayotopoulos et al, ). We choose the NIED tensor solution with a rake of 59°, a dip of 80°, and a strike of 358°.…”
Section: Setting Up Sources On the Istlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the 22 November 2014 M6.2 Northern Nagano earthquake (National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster [NIED] centroid location 36.689°N ; 137.890°E), which is located 3.9 km from the Hi‐net station HBAH, to establish the calibration factor. The earthquake ruptured to the surface, but the highest moment release was at 5‐km depth (NIED, Panayotopoulos et al, ). We choose the NIED tensor solution with a rake of 59°, a dip of 80°, and a strike of 358°.…”
Section: Setting Up Sources On the Istlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mainly follow the overall fault geometry determined by Panayotopoulos et al (2016), which describes an ESE dipping primary fault, and then, we add the secondary structures of the steps and the branches (2) Assumed fault geometry and aftershock distribution. The red and green dots, respectively, represent the hypocentral locations of the aftershocks, which are closer to the primary fault and those deviated from it, respectively (after Panayotopoulos et al 2016). a The top view showing with the outlined fault traces (after Kato et al 1989;Nakata and Imaizumi 2002;Kondo et al 2008); the red and blue lines, respectively, denote surface traces of an active fault (Kamishiro fault) and a presumed geologic fault (Otari-Nakayama fault).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we can observe a geologically identified fault trace above Fault F, where the strike of this geologic fault coincides with that of Fault F (Kato et al 1989) although we do not assume the continuity each other. Other remarkable features are shallow low-angle branch fault (hereafter Fault B1) and a conjugate fault (hereafter Fault H2) assumed for the northern part, inferred from the aftershock distribution (Panayotopoulos et al 2016) and the field surveys . Fault B1 is merged to Fault B2 at depth, converged to the primary fault down dip.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each event is linked to their neighbors through commonly observed phases with a maximum hypocentral separation between linked events of 5 km, resulting in 494,060 P wave pairs and 424,936 S wave pairs. The distribution of relocated hypocenters (Figure S4) generally agrees with those by Panayotopoulos et al [].…”
Section: Relocation Of Foreshock Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%