2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1259-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seizure outcome with surgical management of epileptogenic ganglioglioma: a study of 55 patients

Abstract: Surgical treatment is effective and safe for patients with epileptogenic gangliogliomas. Early surgical intervention is necessary for achieving early seizure control. Neither intraoperative ECoG nor IOUS necessarily leads to better seizure control, although the latter can be helpful in achieving complete tumor resection. Simple lesionectomy is sufficient for favorable postoperative seizure outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsequent report 20 describing 55 patients with epileptogenic ganglioglioma revealed 48 (87%) Engel Class I outcomes, consistent with prior studies, but did not show extent of resection to be a significant predictor of seizure outcome. Intraoperative ECoG, used in 42 patients, also did not affect outcome, and neither did a temporal versus an extratemporal tumor location.…”
Section: Oncological Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A subsequent report 20 describing 55 patients with epileptogenic ganglioglioma revealed 48 (87%) Engel Class I outcomes, consistent with prior studies, but did not show extent of resection to be a significant predictor of seizure outcome. Intraoperative ECoG, used in 42 patients, also did not affect outcome, and neither did a temporal versus an extratemporal tumor location.…”
Section: Oncological Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…7 This includes case series in which ECoG was used to localize interictal spikes intraoperatively and ictal onset extraoperatively. 8,20,23,28 Although GTR is not always technically achievable, this limitation does not necessarily leave patients in these cases with ongoing uncontrolled epilepsy. However, the treatment factors that could predispose toward a good outcome in the context of STR have not been well established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with total resection rates between 61% and 76% reported after "conventional" surgery without the use of intraoperative resection control, our results are very promising. 9,16,24,31 Although the patients who underwent surgery that included neuronavigation/iopMRI had lesions close to eloquent brain areas, and therefore had a higher risk of incomplete resection than those patients who underwent surgery without the multimodal approach, we achieved better results regarding excellent seizure control (73% vs 58% Engel Class IA). Although GTR for the whole study population and GTR after the first intraoperative highfield MR scan for the subgroup using this multimodal approach were identified as one of the prognostic factors for freedom from seizures, one has to keep in mind the different sample sizes used for the statistical analysis (see "Study Limitations" below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There are still several controversies regarding surgical treatment of patients with temporal LGG and no standard guide exists showing the best surgical approach to this patients. There have been mainly four types of surgery including standard anterior temporal resection only, standard anterior temporal with amygdalohippocampectomy, extended lesionectomy with amygdalo-hippocampectomy and extended lesionectomy 19,23,24,25,26 . We generally performed the following protocol: in non-dominant temporal lobe, tumor removal was done by standard anterior temporal with amygdalohippocampectomy; but in case of dominant side, we respected the mesial structures and performed extended lesionectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%