2001
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Select-and-Fill-in Concept Map Scores as a Measure of Students’ Connected Understanding of Science

Abstract: This article describes two related studies that began to explore the validity of scores from select-and-fill-in (SAFI) concept map assessments as measures of students’ connected understanding of science. Scores from SAFI maps created for this purpose and used with middle school students and undergraduate astronomy students possessed high internal consistency and exhibited large mean increases with increased domain exposure. SAFI scores were strongly related to scores from a standardized multiple-choice (MC) ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition accuracy and convergence scores better reflect the differences in students' knowledge than salience scores since the percent of variability among students is higher for proposition accuracy and convergence scores than for salience scores. Schau et al (1997) reviewed different types of concept mapping techniques and chose the fill-in-the-map technique to measure seventh and eighth grade students' knowledge structure. They conducted their study to explore the validity of the fill-in-concept map format as an assessment tool.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition accuracy and convergence scores better reflect the differences in students' knowledge than salience scores since the percent of variability among students is higher for proposition accuracy and convergence scores than for salience scores. Schau et al (1997) reviewed different types of concept mapping techniques and chose the fill-in-the-map technique to measure seventh and eighth grade students' knowledge structure. They conducted their study to explore the validity of the fill-in-concept map format as an assessment tool.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum number of propositions is uncertain [16], and more propositions does not always mean better knowledge on subject, it could also mean inability to differentiate between what is important and what are marginal pieces of knowledge. CCM tasks are considered an open-ended response because as each mental model has some unique components [17], it is not feasible to list all possible correct constructs in advance. AKASs are implemented only for about 41 % of systems that use an open-ended response [18].…”
Section: A Cm-based Knowledge Assessment Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the researchers introduced fill-in-the-map and collaborative concept mapping techniques. First, they explained the fill-in-the-map technique based on an introduction provided by Schau, Mattern, Weber, Minnick, and Witt (1997). In this approach key words are omitted by the instructor in a skeleton map and the learners are supposed to listen attentively to a passage and jot down the key words in so-called blank spaces.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%