2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02494107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected concentration techniques for gas chromatographic analysis of environmental samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and cause severe health problems when they exceed the critical dose [1][2][3]. Currently, a combination of high-resolution gas chromatography and mass spectrometry is widely used as a powerful means for the detection of these compounds; this method is, however, expensive and time-consuming, and is not always able to distinguish isomers [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and cause severe health problems when they exceed the critical dose [1][2][3]. Currently, a combination of high-resolution gas chromatography and mass spectrometry is widely used as a powerful means for the detection of these compounds; this method is, however, expensive and time-consuming, and is not always able to distinguish isomers [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gas chromatography, an electron capture detector (ECD) was selected due to high sensitivity and precision (Li, Zhang, & Zhang, 2008;Namiesnik & Zygmunt, 2002;Rezaei, Bidari, & Birjandi, 2008;Tang, Chen, & Shao, 2004). However, in the case of impurities coexisting, samples have to be pretreated prior to GC analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static methods typically involve pressurising a vial containing the sample and then sampling with either a gas-tight syringe, a multiport sampling valve, or with solid phase microextraction (SPME) (Pawliszyn, 1997;Wercinski, 1999). Dynamic methods typically involve applying a flow of carrier, or sweep, gas to the vial containing the sample and passing the sweep gas (along with any VOCs in the headspace) out of the sample matrix and vial and through either a cryostat, adsorbent, or solvent to collect the VOCs (Bruno, 2009 (Boswell, 1999;Helmig, 1999;Ioffe et al, 1984;Namiesnik & Zygmut, 2002;Preito et al, 2000). Headspace analysis has been used by several research groups to investigate the VOCs emitted from meat, e.g., pork and poultry, under different packaging and storage conditions (Ahn, Nam, Du, & Jo, 2001;Olsen et al, 2005;Senter, Arnold, & Chew, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%