Selected Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Surgical Science

Chitwood, W. Randolph; Sabiston, David C.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_4

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At first the scientific community rejected this. At a meeting of the American Surgical Association, he encountered strong opposition; however, this type of analytic thought, systematic collection and analysis of data was the birth of surgical science [2, 3]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why I use both prospective randomized trials and registry data when choosing the personalized treatment of an AAA patient

Shah

Darling

2018

Gefässchirurgie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been the core of level 1 data in medical and surgical science for at least the last three decades. However, frequently patient selection is very narrow, anatomic criteria do not match real-world experience, and much of the work is done in selected academic centers. We use RCTs to help explain the rational for intervention and then rely on longitudinal registries and single center data to give the patients a real-world expectation concerning outcomes and complications in our hands.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%