2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting significant marker genes from microarray data by filter approach for cancer diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Alshamlan [5] and Motieghader et al [16] obtained slightly higher accuracy for Colon cancer classification, yet they are of larger gene's subset. Bouazza et al [31] suggested a filter approach which produced 30 genes for Ovarian cancer classification whereas we could obtain the same accuracy while using only three genes. The same outcome can be seen in the work proposed by Gunavathi & Premalatha [9] who proposed GA for gene selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Even though Alshamlan [5] and Motieghader et al [16] obtained slightly higher accuracy for Colon cancer classification, yet they are of larger gene's subset. Bouazza et al [31] suggested a filter approach which produced 30 genes for Ovarian cancer classification whereas we could obtain the same accuracy while using only three genes. The same outcome can be seen in the work proposed by Gunavathi & Premalatha [9] who proposed GA for gene selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…With the improvement of current high the productivity of biotechnology, advantage selection rapidly includes its performance in the analysis of the vast quantity of producing data 18 . The selection of genes in microarray data is one of these important applications because microarray data sets usually have a high advantage ratio for the sample, that is, several thousand features (genes) with only a few dozen samples 19 . There are many features selection methods applied in our approaches such as ReliefF, MultiSURF Lasso, Elastic Net, and Elastic Net CV.…”
Section: Materials and The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bouazza et al [11] carried out a comparative study on feature subset selection. Five cancer microarray datasets were evaluated using five supervised classifiers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they [11] suggested the signal to noise ratio feature selection method with K Nearest Neighbors classifier for feature selection. Comparatively wrappers and filters are used simply with good performance [2,8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Yet, some studies show lack of performance due to direct application of wrappers into the original datasets [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%